检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张祖增 陈科睿 ZHANG Zuzeng;CHEN Kerui(Institute of Environmental Law,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088)
出 处:《环境污染与防治》2022年第6期824-828,共5页Environmental Pollution & Control
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目(No.21AZD062)。
摘 要:《环境噪声污染防治法》难以适配生态文明建设秩序期待的一个重要原因在于现行噪声立法在规范层面存在诸多问题,主要表现在:法律名称与传统环境要素污染立法体例表达上不一致,立法生态化理念缺失,环境噪声侵权归责原则适用混乱,噪声治理涵射范围过于狭隘及噪声污染衡量标准长期错位。基于此,应厘清《环境噪声污染防治法》修订的规范理路,从立法理念的生态化、名称表达的统一化、噪声污染定义的扩大化、侵权归责原则回归的理性化等方面对现行噪声立法进行调适与优化。The“Law on the prevention and control of environmental noise pollution”is difficult to adapt to ecological civilization construction order for an the current noise legislation dilemma in the specification of many supply,mainly manifested in:the inconsistent legislation expression between legal name and traditional environmental pollution,lack of legislative ecological concept,environmental noise infringement liability principle applicable chaos,noise control culvert range too narrow and noise pollution measurement long-term dislocation.To clarify the standardized management of the revision of“Law on the prevention and control of environmental noise pollution”,the current noise legislation should be adjusted and optimized from the ecological legislative concept,the unification of name expression,the expansion of the definition of noise pollution and the rationality of the return of infringement liability principle.
关 键 词:环境噪声污染防治法 生态文明建设 规范理路 调适 优化
分 类 号:X593[环境科学与工程—环境工程] D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.70.102