欧阳修的《易》筮分观主张与人事旨归  

Ouyang Xiu’s Proposition of Separating Yijingfrom Divination and His Humanistic Tenet

作　　者：陈彦杰 CHEN Yan-jie

机构地区：[1]山东大学易学与中国古代哲学研究中心,山东济南250100 [2]山东大学哲学与社会发展学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《周易研究》2022年第1期47-53,共7页Studies of Zhouyi

基　　金：国家社科基金项目:“乾嘉象数易学及其义理意涵研究”(17CZX031)。

摘　　要：学界以往对欧阳修易学的研究多关注其疑经的一面。事实上,欧阳修的辨伪并非纯粹知识理性视野下的考察与怀疑,其目的是为自己的易学思想张本。他质疑《系辞》《文言》等文本为孔子所作的观点,但并未否定这些经典的价值,而是破而后立,对其予以全新定位。他力图将《周易》与卜筮分离,提出《易》为文王所作的全新看法,进而别具一格地提出“修吾人事而已”的易学主张,强调易学仅从人事角度诠释即可,无需过分关注天道问题。其易学呈现出强烈的人文主义品格。Previous studies of Ouyang Xiu’s(1007-1072) scholarship on the Changes mainly focus on his doubting about the authorship of the Yijing. In fact, Ouyang Xiu’s distinguishing false did not aim to investigate and suspect from the perspective of pure intellectual rationality but to establish his own thought based on the Changes. While he was arguing that Xici(Commentary on the Appended Phrases) and Wenyan(Commentary on the Words of the Text) were not written by Confucius, he did not deny their value. Instead, he gave them an overall new positioning. He tried to separate Zhouyi from divination, put forward a brand new view that Yi was written by King Wen(c.1152-c.1056 BCE). Then he particularly put forward that “cultivating human affairs is enough”, emphasizing that Yi could be interpreted only from the perspective of human affairs without much attention to the Dao of Heaven, which presents a strong humanistic quality.

关 键 词：欧阳修 占筮 义理 人事 

分 类 号：B244.99[哲学宗教—中国哲学]