转换和超越:卢卡奇从历史本体论走向社会存在本体论  

Transformation and Transcendence:Lukács’s Transition from Historical Ontology to Social Being Ontology

作　　者：屈直[1] QU Zhi

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学哲学院,430073

出　　处：《国外社会科学前沿》2022年第5期88-99,共12页JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCES

摘　　要：青年时期的卢卡奇曾塑造了历史本体论,他提出以“历史”作为本体揭示事实之间的历史联系与事物的变化发展。但历史本体论将辩证法局限在社会历史领域并排斥自然辩证法,造成了自然与社会的长期对立。为了破解历史本体论的局限性,卢卡奇在晚年提出“返回到存在去”,以劳动为核心构建了马克思主义哲学真正的本体论——社会存在本体论,实现了本体论的转换和超越。通过确立社会存在本体论,卢卡奇恢复了马克思历史唯物主义理论的传统。具体地说,他还原了以实践为基础的历史唯物主义理论的框架,在理论层面高度肯定了马克思的社会关系理论,将马克思唯物主义哲学的研究领域定义为研究社会历史,彰显了马克思主义哲学不同于旧哲学的革命意义。In his youth,Lukacs once shaped the ontology of history.He proposed to use"history"as the ontology to reveal the historical connection between facts and the change and development of things.However,historical ontology limits dialectics to the field of social history and excludes dialectics of nature,resulting in a long-term confrontation between nature and society.In order to crack the limitations of historical ontology,Lukacs proposed"returning to existence"in his later years,and built the real ontology of Marxist philosophy-social existence ontology with labor as the core,realizing the transformation and transcendence of ontology.By establishing the ontology of social being,Lukacs restores the tradition of Marx’s theory of historical materialism.Specifically,he restored the framework of the theory of historical materialism based on practice,highly affirmed Marx’s theory of social relations at the theoretical level,defined the research field of Marxist materialist philosophy as the study of social history,and demonstrated Marxist philosophy.Different from the revolutionary meaning of the old philosophy.

关 键 词：卢卡奇 历史本体论 社会存在本体论 劳动 历史唯物主义 

分 类 号：A81[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]