检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:雷庆锐 姜周群 LEI Qing-rui;JIANG Zhou-qun(School cf Literature and Journalism,Qinghai Nationalities University,Xining Qinghai 810007,China)
机构地区:[1]青海民族大学文学与新闻传播学院,青海西宁810007
出 处:《廊坊师范学院学报(社会科学版)》2022年第2期5-10,共6页Journal of Langfang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:相较于其他文学形式,中国新诗积累了大量深层次的矛盾和理论困惑。为了解决中国新诗的困境,叶公超全面阐述艾略特的诗学,将其“非个人化”诗学和中国文学传统、新诗现实境遇结合起来,对其“非个人化”理论创造性地进行了延伸和扩充。这不仅体现在叶公超改造出有利于情绪表达的传统格律、以文本为本位的艺术世界,而且体现在他对读者接受过程中阅读困难的理解。叶公超的诗学在中国语境下实现了对艾略特“非个人化”诗学的创造性接受,并生发出了属于自己的诗学。Compared with other literary forms, Chinese new poetry has accumulated a large number of deep-seated contradictions and theoretical perplexities. In order to solve the dilemma of Chinese new poetry, Ye Gongchao comprehensively expounds T. S. Eliot′s poetics, combines his "non-personalization" poetics with Chinese literary tradition and the realistic situation of new poetry,and creatively extends and expands his "non-personalization" theory. This is not only reflected in Ye Gongchao′s transformation of the traditional meter which is conducive to emotional expression and the text-based art world, but also in his understanding of the difficulty of reading in the process of readers′ acceptance. Ye Gongchao′s poetics has achieved creative acceptance of Eliot′s "non-personalized" poetics in the Chinese context and produced his own poetics.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.163.75