“城中村”改造安置补偿纠纷中适法问题的检视与规则建构  

Examination and Rule Construction of Appropriation Legal Issues in the Compensation Dispute for the Renovation and Resettlement of “Urban Villages”

作　　者：于红涛 李晶晶 Yu Hongtao;Li Jingjing(Henan Provincial High People’s Court,Zhengzhou,Henan 450008)

机构地区：[1]河南省高级人民法院行政庭,河南郑州450008

出　　处：《河南司法警官职业学院学报》2022年第2期45-51,共7页Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College

摘　　要：从“城中村”改造安置补偿纠纷的行政审判实践看,各地“城中村”改造过程中存在着征收补偿方案法律地位不明确、区域间补偿方式和标准差异较大、村民获补偿资格认定标准不统一等突出问题。结合当前立法精神和集体土地“三权分置”的改革方向,人民法院在审理“城中村”改造安置补偿纠纷过程中,应当明确安置补偿方案的行政承诺属性,审查安置补偿方案的合法性,建构宅基地资格权安置与地上附着物财产价值一并补偿原则,明确农村集体经济组织成员资格丧失和继受取得的法定标准,依法确立司法审查介入村民自治的界限。Judging from the administrative trial practice of compensation disputes over the transformation and resettlement of “urban villages”, in the process of transformation of “urban villages” in various localities, there are prominent problems such as unclear legal status of expropriation compensation schemes, large differences in compensation methods and standards between regions, and inconsistent standards for determining the qualifications of villagers to receive compensation. Combined with the current legislative spirit and the reform direction of the “separation of the three rights” of collective land, in the course of hearing disputes over compensation for the transformation and resettlement of “urban villages”, the people’s courts shall clarify the administrative commitment attributes of the resettlement compensation plan, review the legality of the resettlement compensation plan, construct the principle of compensation for the right to resettlement of the qualification right to residential land and the property value of the attachments on the ground, clarify the statutory standards for the loss of membership and the succession of rural collective organizations, and establish the boundaries of judicial review intervention in villagers’ autonomy in accordance with law.

关 键 词：城中村 安置补偿 法律适用 

分 类 号：DF74[政治法律—诉讼法学]