非期望产出对“双一流”建设高校科技创新效率的影响研究  

The impact of undesired outputs on science and technology innovation efficiencies of"Double First-Class"construction universities

作　　者：朱恬恬[1] 卢雅华 张跃军[2] ZHU Tiantian;LU Yahua;ZHANG Yuejun(Educational Science Research Institute, Hunan University;Business School, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)

机构地区：[1]湖南大学教育科学研究院 [2]湖南大学工商管理学院,湖南长沙410082

出　　处：《高校教育管理》2022年第4期31-40,共10页Journal of Higher Education Management

基　　金：中国学位与研究生教育学会重大课题(2020ZAC5);湖南省自然科学基金项目(2022JJ30180);湖南省教育厅学位与研究生教改重点项目(2020JGZD018)。

摘　　要：高校科技创新过程中不可避免地存在非期望产出,传统的科技创新效率评价模型关于“产出最大化”的假定并不适用,评价结果会出现偏误。为此,本研究在考虑非期望产出的基础上,采用SML指数方法评价2007—2019年我国67所“双一流”建设高校的科技创新效率。结果显示:在样本期间内,不考虑非期望产出会高估高校的科技创新效率;在考虑非期望产出的情况下,一流学科建设高校的科技创新效率并不比一流大学建设高校逊色;医药类高校的科技创新效率较高,而农林类高校的科技创新效率相对较低;不同地区“双一流”建设高校的科技创新效率存在差异,整体呈现东高中低的分布特征;不同地区“双一流”建设高校科技创新效率提升的动力也不尽相同,东部地区高校科技创新效率增长的主要动力是技术进步,而中西部地区是资源配置效率的提升。鉴于此,相关部门应优化学科资源配置格局,加强协同创新;关注高校非期望产出,考查成果质量和社会贡献;提升高校服务区域经济社会发展能力,促进各地区协调发展。Undesired outputs are inevitable in the process of science and technology(S&T)innovation in universities.The assumption of"output maximization"in traditional models for S&T innovation efficiency evaluation does not apply,and there are biases in evaluation results.With undesired outputs considered,this study adopts the sequential Malmquist-Luenberger index method to evaluate S&T innovation efficiencies of 67"Double First-Class"construction universities in China from 2007 to 2019.Results show that,university S&T innovation efficiencies are overestimated with undesired outputs ignored;S&T innovation efficiencies of first-class disciplines construction universities are not inferior to that of first-class universities construction universities with undesired outputs considered;S&T innovation efficiencies of medical universities are higher,while those of agricultural and forestry universities are lower;S&T innovation efficiencies of"Double First-Class"construction universities in different regions are different,and overall distribution characteristics are that efficiencies in the eastern region are higher,while those in the central region are lower;the main driving force for the growth of S&T innovation efficiencies of universities in the eastern region is technological progress,while that in the central and western regions is the improvement of resource allocation efficiencies.Therefore,relevant departments should optimize allocation patterns of discipline resources,and strengthen collaborative innovation;pay attention to university undesired outputs,and strengthen the inspection for output quality and social contribution;improve university abilites to serve regional economic and social development,and promote coordinated development of various regions.

关 键 词：“双一流”建设 高校 科技创新效率 非期望产出 SML指数 

分 类 号：G640[文化科学—高等教育学]