人工智能辅助刑事审判的限度  

Limits of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Criminal Trials

作　　者：胡佳[1] Hu Jia(School of Law,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610207,China)

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院,四川成都610207

出　　处：《政法学刊》2022年第3期27-34,共8页Journal of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：人工智能只能辅助法官审判,而不是替代法官决策。实务中人工智能的运用已经几乎覆盖刑事诉讼全流程,涉及证据审查、量刑预测等实质性事项。在利用“技术红利”提高审判质效的同时,人工智能运用也确确实实压缩了法官的审判空间。有必要在理论上划定人工智能辅助审判的“能”与“不能”,为其确立边界。在辅助逻辑上,人工智能是检查校对法官的裁判而不是生成裁判结果本身。在辅助的基本规则上,人工智能是参考性辅助而非规范性辅助。在辅助的具体内容上,人工智能辅助审判主要针对情节简单、标准客观或主观裁量较少的案件,主要适用于庭下环节而非庭审环节。Artificial intelligence can only assist judges in trials,not substitute judges for decision-making.The application of artificial intelligence in practice has almost covered the entire process of criminal proceedings,involving substantive matters such as evidence review and sentencing prediction.While using"technical dividends"to improve the quality and effectiveness of trials,the use of artificial intelligence has indeed compressed the judge’s trial space.It is necessary to delineate the"ability"and"inability"of artificial intelligence-assisted trials in theory,and establish the necessary boundaries for them.In terms of auxiliary logic,artificial intelligence is to check the judge’s referees of the proofreading judges rather than to generate the results of the judges themselves.In terms of the basic rules of assistance,artificial intelligence is a reference assistance rather than a normative assistance.In terms of the specific content of assistance,artificial intelligence-assisted trials are mainly for cases with simple plots,objective standards,or less subjective judgments,and are mainly applicable to the out-of-court link rather than the trial link.

关 键 词：人工智能 智慧法院 量刑预测 证据校验 证据标准指引 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]