意识形态、社会—历史现实与马克思的政治哲学——与吴晓明教授商榷  

Ideology, Sociohistorical Reality, and Marx’s Political Philosophy:A Discussion with Professor Wu Xiaoming

作　　者：谭清华[1] TAN Qinghua(School of Marxism Studies,Renmin University of China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《中国人民大学学报》2022年第3期56-64,共9页Journal of Renmin University of China

基　　金：中国人民大学科学研究基金项目“公共性视域下的马克思政治哲学:阐释与建构”(15XNB013)研究成果。

摘　　要：吴晓明教授从意识形态和社会—历史现实两个角度对当前国内马克思政治哲学研究中存在的问题进行了批评。这些批评不仅反映了吴文对马克思的意识形态、社会—历史现实与马克思政治哲学及其关系的诸多误解,而且从根本上说,也反映了吴文对作为规范理论的马克思政治哲学的属性的拒斥。然而,马克思政治哲学作为规范理论,不仅符合唯物史观的精神实质,而且也是厘清马克思政治哲学与其他政治哲学之间的联系和区别,将其与历史唯物主义、与马克思的政治思想和政治理论、与马克思的伦理学等相关或相近学科区分开来的关键,同时也能更好地明确和凸显今天我们研究马克思政治哲学的意义并深化马克思主义哲学研究。Wu Xiaoming criticizes the problems of previous scholarship on Marx’s political philosophy in China from the perspectives of ideology and sociohistorical reality.His criticism not only betrays his misunderstanding on Marx’s ideology, sociohistorical reality, and Marx’s political philosophy as well as their relationship, but also expresses his rejection of Marx’s political philosophy as a normative theory.However, Marx’s political philosophy as a normative theory is not only in line with the essence of historical materialism, but also key in both clarifying the connections and differences between Marx’s political philosophy and other political philosophies and distinguishing itself from historical materialism, Marx’s political thought and political theory, Marx’s ethics, and other related disciplines.It also better explains the significance of today’s study of Marxist political philosophy particularly and the study of Marxist philosophy in general.

关 键 词：马克思政治哲学 意识形态 唯物史观 

分 类 号：D0[政治法律—政治学]