刑事第二审指定管辖问题的思考——以王成忠民事枉法裁判案为视角  

Reflection on the Designated Jurisdiction in Criminal Second Instance:from the Perspective of Wang Chengzhong’s Civil Case of Law-Perverting

作　　者：刘佳敏 LIU Jia-min(School of Law, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China)

机构地区：[1]南开大学法学院,天津300350

出　　处：《唐山学院学报》2022年第4期48-55,共8页Journal of Tangshan University

摘　　要：在我国《刑事诉讼法》第27条关于指定管辖的规定中,没有明确指定管辖仅适用于刑事第一审程序,而在司法实践中指定管辖通常都仅发生于刑事第一审程序,因整体回避发生的刑事第二审指定管辖则实属例外。在我国《刑事诉讼法》现有法律框架下,刑事第二审指定管辖虽然有效解决了整体回避制度阙如所带来的实际问题,但同时也暴露出此举于法无据的明显漏洞。文章以王成忠民事枉法裁判案为视角,对刑事第二审指定管辖的争议及合理性进行分析,并据此从立法和实务两方面提出完善刑事第二审指定管辖制度的相关思路。In Article 27 of China’s Criminal Procedure Law on the designated jurisdiction,it is not clarified that the designated jurisdiction applies to the criminal first instance alone,while in judicial practice,it usually occurs only in the first instance,and the designated jurisdiction in the second instance caused by the overall avoidance is an exception.Under the present legal framework of China’s Criminal Procedure Law,although the designated jurisdiction in the second instance has solved the practical problems caused by the lack of the overall avoidance system,it exposes the obvious loopholes without legal support.From the perspective of Wang Chengzhong’s civil case of law-perverting,this article analyzes the disputes and rationality of the designated jurisdiction in the criminal second instance,and then puts forward relevant ideas for improving this system from both legislative and practical aspects.

关 键 词：指定管辖 刑事第二审程序 整体回避 管辖异议 

分 类 号：D925.21[政治法律—诉讼法学]