检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任海月 REN Haiyue(Liaoning University,Liaoning Shenyang 110031)
出 处:《山西警察学院学报》2022年第3期33-39,共7页Journal of Shanxi Police College
基 金:2019年度国家社会科学基金青年项目“我国危害生态环境犯罪的罪量要素研究”(19CFX030)阶段性成果。
摘 要:为严厉打击污染环境行为,我国污染环境罪刑事立法趋于积极化、严密化、早期化,立法内容趋向科学合理。但是,司法实践暴露出严重的罪量认定混乱、标准不明、同案不同判的现象。并且此种现象并不是个例,在处置型污染环境罪中尤为明显。我国司法实践亟需建立明确清晰的罪量认定标准,并引入环境鉴定帮助法院认定罪量,进而以刑法推动我国生态文明建设的进一步发展。China s criminal legislation on environmental pollution crime tends to be active,rigorous and early,and the legislative content tends to be scientific and reasonable.H However,the judicial practice has revealed the phenomenon of confusion in determining the amount of crime,unclear standards and different sentences in the same case.Moreover,this phenomenon is not an isolated case,especially in the disposal type of environmental pollution crime.The judicial practice in China needs to establish clear criteria for determining the amount of crime,and introduce environmental identification to help the court determine the amount of crime,so as to promote the further development of China s ecological civilization by criminal law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170