检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭诚信[1] 许素敏 PENG Cheng-xin;XU Su-min
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院,上海200030 [2]上海交通大学中国法与社会研究院,上海200030
出 处:《求是学刊》2022年第3期102-113,共12页Seeking Truth
基 金:上海高校特聘教授(东方学者)岗位计划资助。
摘 要:“新型权利”仅是描述性概念而非规范性术语,其应否获得法律保护以及采取何种方式予以保护一直是困扰法官裁判的重要问题,需要法律予以一定回应。《民法典》采取“新增有名权利”“新增有名权益“”扩大有名权利的内涵“”增加一般人格利益保护条款”等多种形式明确规定部分“新型权利”的法律保护,能够为法官裁判此类案件提供相对明确的法律依据,具有重要的规范价值。此外,《民法典》通过设置民事权利保护的一般条款,为尚未被《民法典》明确规定的其他“新型权利”的保护提供了规范基础,充分体现了《民法典》在“新型权利”保护问题上的开放性。“New rights” is only a descriptive concept rather than a normative term. Whether it should be pro-tected by law and in what way it should be protected have always been important issues troubling judges’ deci-sions, and certain responses are required from the law. The Civil Code adopts various forms such as “addingnew named rights” , “adding new named interests” , “expanding the connotation of named rights” and “addinggeneral personality interests protection” . The Civil Code provides for the legal protection of some “new rights” in various forms, which can provide judges with a relatively clear legal basis for adjudicating such cases andhas important normative value. In addition,, the Civil Code provides a normative basis for the protection of oth-er “new rights” that have not been explicitly provided for in it by setting up general provisions for the protec-tion of civil rights. The openness of the Civil Code in the protection of “new rights” is fully reflected.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145