防范科学主义艺术理论与时-空语法检测——就海德格尔《物的追问》而论  

Guarding Against Scientific Art Theory and Time-Space Grammar Detection-On The Question Concerning The Things by Heidegger

作　　者：刘彦顺 LIU Yan-shun(College of Liberal Arts,Jinan University,Guangzhou 510632,China)

机构地区：[1]暨南大学文学院,广东广州510632

出　　处：《美育学刊》2022年第4期44-52,共9页Journal of Aesthetic Education

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“现象学美学中的时间性思想及其效应研究”(16BZW024)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：海德格尔通过对康德《纯粹理性批判》“知觉之预测”一节的阐发,既肯定康德在意向性理论上的贡献,又指出其局限,继而揭示审美生活与科学生活在构成方式上的差异以及时间性表征。他认为,西方思想的重大缺陷之一在于对审美生活的意向性构成方式施行科学主义瓦解,并滋生出孤立研究审美主体与审美客体的科学主义艺术理论;但他并未揭示两者的构成差异在于绝对同时性与相对同时性。海德格尔不再信服与使用时间意识思想及术语、陈述方式,导致他在反对科学主义艺术理论的无时间性、无空间性弊端时,虽然突出了艺术作品诸要素在空间位置关系构成上的整体性,却无法对审美生活所显现的流畅时体进行时位构成描述,从而陷入喑哑、失语与陈述困难。Heidegger expounds on the section of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason entitled“The Prediction of Perception”,which not only confirms Kant's contribution to the theory of intentionality but also points out its limitations,and then reveals the differences between the aesthetic life and the scientific life in terms of composition and temporal representation.He argues that one of the major flaws of Western thought lies in the scientific disintegration to the intentional composition of aesthetic life,and the breeding of scientific art theory that studies the aesthetic subject and aesthetic object in isolation.However,he does not reveal that the structural difference between the two lies in absolute simultaneity and relative simultaneity.Heidegger no longer believes in and uses the idea of time consciousness,terms and statement methods,which leads him to fall into mute,aphasia and statement difficulties when he opposes the disadvantages of the scientific art theory of no time and no space.Although he highlights the integrity of the elements of art works in the composition of spatial position relations,he is unable to describe the time and position composition of the fluid aspect revealed in the aesthetic life.

关 键 词：海德格尔 科学主义艺术理论 审美时间性 流畅时体 时-空语法 

分 类 号：J01[艺术—艺术理论]