宋四六在清代的接受与影响——以《宋四六选》《宋四六话》为例  

The Acceptance and Influence of Song Si-Liu in Qing Dynasty:Take Anthology of Song Si-Liu and Talks of Song Si-Liu for Examples

作　　者：张炳文[1] Zhang Bingwen

机构地区：[1]南京大学文学院

出　　处：《励耘学刊》2022年第1期155-171,M0008,M0009,共19页

摘　　要：清代文章骈散之争以“汉学”“宋学”为学术背景。桐城派古文家注重唐宋古文;汉学家为争取骈文正宗地位,骈文选本重视六朝文。在乾嘉时代,宋四六在两派之中都受到冷落。彭元瑞的《宋四六选》《宋四六话》专以宋四六为辑录对象,其旨趣与孙梅《四六丛话》有相似之处,即为宋四六尊体,但更加精纯,尤具骈文史意义,甚至有一定的学术史意义。《宋四六选》《宋四六话》体现了宋四六在清代的接受与影响,也表明汉宋调和、骈散折中在清代其实经历了很漫长的过程。The debate between parallel prose and ancient prose in Qing Dynasty was based on the controversy between Han and Song School.The ancient prose writers of Tongcheng School paid attention to the ancient prose of Tang and Song.The parallel prose writers of Han School paid attention to the literature of Six Dynasties in order to strive for orthodox status of parallel prose.Song Si-Liu was neglected in both schools at the time of Qianlong and Jiaqing.Meanwhile,Peng Yuanrui's Anthology of Song Si-Liu and Talks of Song Si-Liu focused on Song Si-Liu,which purport were similar to Sun Mei's Series Talks of Si-Liu.They wanted to establish respectful style of Song Si-Liu.However,Peng's books were purer in terms of philology,especially having the significance of parallel prose criticism history,and even the value of academic history.Anthology of Song Si-Liu and Talks of Song Si-Liu reflected the acceptance and influence of Song Si-Liu in Qing Dynasty.Furthermore,it showed that,the compromise between parallel prose and ancient prose along with the reconciliation between Han and Song School was a long process in Qing Dynasty.

关 键 词：汉宋之争 骈文复兴 《宋四六选》 《宋四六话》 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学] K244[历史地理—历史学] K249[历史地理—中国史]