检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋岱霖 张志莹 SONG Dai-lin;ZHANG Zhi-ying(School of Law,Jilin University,Changchun Jilin 130012,China)
出 处:《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》2022年第3期76-80,共5页Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators
摘 要:量刑规范化改革是我国司法改革的重要组成部分,界定其含义与目标,对量刑规范化的实现具有重要意义。自最高人民法院颁布《关于常见犯罪的量刑指导意见》后,我国司法审判中的量刑方式从“估堆式”逐渐转变为“规范化量刑”。在“规范化量刑”的实施过程中,量刑基准的确定是量刑规范的基础,避免犯罪事实重复评价和增强疑难案件的可操作性是规范化改革的重点,为了克服规范化量刑弊端,可以通过促进“量刑均衡”、引入智慧量刑系统予以解决。The standardization of sentencing reform is an important part of China's judicial reform.It is of great significance to define its meaning and goals and realize the standardization of sentencing.Since the Supreme People's Court promulgated the sentencing guidelines of common crime,justice of sentencing mode in our country gradually has changed from uestimated pile sentencing"into ustandardized sentencing".In the process of the implementation of the"standardization of sentencing",the determination of sentencing benchmark is the basis of sentencing specifications,and avoiding criminal facts repeated evaluation and enhancing the maneuverability of the difficult case is the key of the standardization reform,In order to overcome the disadvantages of standardized sentencing,it can be solved by promoting"balanced sentencing"and introducing intelligent sentencing system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7