城市旅游发展与经济—社会—环境协调度研究——以江苏省为例  

Study on the Coordination Degree of Urban Tourism Development and Economy-Society-Environment System:Taking Jiangsu Province as an Example

作　　者：李玉霞[1,2,3] 滕玉浩 潘炳煌 吴敏睫 陈玲玲 LI Yuxia;TENG Yuhao;PAN Binghuang;WU Minjie;CHEN Lingling(School of Geography Science,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing Jiangsu 210023,China;State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base of Geographical Environment Evolution(Jiangsu Province),Nanjing Jiangsu 210023,China;Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application,Nanjing Jiangsu 210023,China;Jiangsu Institute of Geographic Information Industry,Nanjing Jiangsu 211123,China;College of Humanities,Jinling Institute of Technology,Nanjing Jiangsu 211169,China)

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学地理科学学院,江苏南京210023 [2]江苏省地理环境演化国家重点实验室培育建设点,江苏南京210023 [3]江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心,江苏南京210023 [4]江苏省地理信息产业研究院,江苏南京210023 [5]金陵科技学院人文学院,江苏南京211169

出　　处：《生态经济》2022年第8期105-111,共7页Ecological Economy

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目“城市群旅游目的地景观演变、环境效应及生态网络构建研究”(18YJCZH012)。

摘　　要：城市旅游与经济、社会、环境发展的协调一致性,是城市旅游可持续发展的必然选择。论文以江苏省13个城市为例,建立2015—2019年旅游与经济、社会、环境发展的协调度模型,测算各市旅游与经济、社会、环境的协调度,并利用K-Means聚类方法对协调度进行聚类分析,讨论江苏城市旅游发展与经济、社会、环境协调发展的时空分布规律。研究结果表明:从时间上看,南京、无锡、苏州3市的旅游—经济—社会—环境耦合系统整体协调度最高,且2013年后协调度的增幅和增速均明显高于其他城市,连云港、宿迁、盐城、淮安和泰州的整体协调度最低,且提升缓慢。从空间上看,江苏南部5市中,镇江的社会、环境以及常州的经济和社会发展略弱,江苏北部5市以徐州城市旅游发展协调性最好。The coordinated development of urban tourism,economy,society and environment is the inevitable choice for the sustainable development of urban tourism.Taking 13 cities in Jiangsu Province as an example,this paper establishes the coordination degree model of tourism,economic,social and environmental development from 2015 to 2019.Thus,the coordination degree of tourism,economic,social and environmental development of each city are calculated.The K-means clustering method is used to cluster the coordination degree,and the spatial and temporal distribution characteristic of coordinated development of urban tourism,economic,social and environmental development in Jiangsu Province is discussed.The results show that,in terms of time,Nanjing,Wuxi and Suzhou have the highest overall coordination degree of tourism-economy-society-environment coupling system,and the growth value and growth rate of their coordination degree after 2013 are significantly higher than other cities.The overall coordination degree of Lianyungang,Suqian,Yancheng,Huai’an and Taizhou are the lowest,and their growth rates are slow.From the perspective of space,among the five cities in Southern Jiangsu,Zhenjiang’s social and environmental development and Changzhou’s economic and social development are slightly less;among the five cities in Northern Jiangsu,Xuzhou has the best coordination of urban tourism development.

关 键 词：城市旅游 协调度模型 K-MEANS聚类 旅游发展 

分 类 号：F592.7[经济管理—旅游管理]