不同评分方法在口腔医学后牙Ⅱ类洞预备评价的一致性研究  

Evaluating the consistency of different scoring methods of posterior tooth class II cavity preparation in stomatology

作　　者：周如玉[1] 游婧[2] 陆晓庆[1] 周愉 王娟[2] Zhou Ruyu;You Jing;Lu Xiaoqing;Zhou Yu;Wang Juan(Department of Education,Stomatological College of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210029,China;Department of Endodontics,Stomatological College of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210029,China)

机构地区：[1]南京医科大学附属口腔医院教学办公室,南京210029 [2]南京医科大学附属口腔医院牙体牙髓病科,南京210029

出　　处：《中华医学教育杂志》2022年第7期600-603,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical Education

基　　金：2019年南京医科大学教育教学课题(JX2019Z02,JX2019Y03);2019年全国医学专业学位研究生教育指导委员会研究课题(JX220202004)。

摘　　要：目的探讨数字化结果评估系统(以下简称评估系统)和传统评分方法在后牙Ⅱ类洞预备评价的一致性,评价评估系统在医学生临床前技能训练中的应用价值。方法选取南京医科大学2017级口腔医学专业5+3一体化38名学生为研究对象,在其后牙Ⅱ类洞预备的考核中,采用评估系统和3名考官进行评价。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较4组评价结果的差异,采用组内相关系数(intraclass correlation coefficients,ICC)评价评估系统和3名考官之间的一致性。结果评估系统评分为80.05(76.33,80.90)分,考官1评分为79.50(75.75,80.00)分,考官2评分为82.00(78.00,83.00)分,考官3评分为81.00(76.00,83.00)分。4组评价结果总体存在差异(H=12.90,P=0.005)。考官1评分低于考官2,其差异具有统计学意义(P=0.011);其余组评分比较,其差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。评估系统和3名考官评价结果的ICC值均大于0.90,一致性极好。结论评估系统与考官评价结果具有较好的一致性,综合运用评估系统能降低传统评分方法的差异,有助于提高学生评价的准确性。Objective To explore the consistency of digital outcome assessment system and traditional evaluation method in the evaluation of posterior tooth classⅡcavity preparation,and to evaluate its application value in preclinical skill training of medical students.Methods Thirty-eight medical students from 5+3 integrated program enrolled in 2017 at stomatological college of Nanjing Medical University were selected to participate in the examination of class II cavities preparation.The prepared teeth were evaluated by digital outcome assessment system and three examiners.The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the differences of scores from the four groups,and the intraclass correlation coefficients(ICC)was used to evaluate consistencies between digital outcome assessment system and examiners.Results Scores from digital outcome assessment system were 80.05(76.33,80.90),examiner 1 were 79.50(75.75,80.00),examiner 2 were 82.00(78.00,83.00),and examiner 3 were 81.00(76.00,83.00).There were significant differences in the evaluation results of the four groups(H=12.90,P=0.005).Scores in examiner 1 were lower than that of examiner 2,the difference was statistically significant(P=0.011);there were no significant differences in evaluation results among the other groups(all P>0.05).The ICC values of digital outcome assessment system and the results from three examiners were all greater than 0.90,which showing excellent agreement.Conclusions There were strong consistencies between digital outcome assessment system and examiners in evaluation results.The comprehensive application of the digital outcome assessment system can reduce the individual differences by traditional scoring methods,and help improve the accuracy of student evaluations.

关 键 词：医学生 口腔医学 评估系统 Ⅱ类洞预备 考核 评价 一致性 

分 类 号：R-4[医药卫生]