基于文献计量的国内外碳排放权交易研究现状分析  

Analysis of Differences Between Domestic and Foreign Carbon Emission Trading Research Based on Bibliometrics

作　　者：李涛[1] 宋志成 石梦舒 马裕泽 Li Tao;Song Zhicheng;Shi Mengshu;Ma Yuze(School of Economics and Management,North China Electric Power University,Beijing 102206,China)

机构地区：[1]华北电力大学经济与管理学院,北京102206

出　　处：《科技管理研究》2022年第13期199-208,共10页Science and Technology Management Research

基　　金：国家社会科学重大项目“面向国家能源安全的智慧能源创新模式与政策协同机制研究”(19ZDA081);国家社会科学基金一般项目“促进能源工业绿色转型的经济政策体系研究”(19BGL011)。

摘　　要：基于文献计量学方法,利用VOSviewer、CiteSpace V等软件,对Web of Science(WoS)核心合集收录的10643篇文献及中国知网(CNKI)收录的核心期刊中的5576篇碳排放权交易相关文献进行计量分析与对比,探索该领域研究现状及发展趋势。结果表明,我国在该领域的研究能力不断提升;在该领域国家之间的合作研究呈现实力不均衡特征,我国研究机构与美英研究机构合作较为紧密;与国际文献相比,国内文献多从政策、市场机制、市场体系等方面展开研究,对能源消费与碳足迹追踪等角度的研究较少。最后,总结了我国现阶段碳排放权交易研究方面的短板与问题,以期为未来在该领域开展研究的学者提供参考。Based on bibliometrics method,using VOSViewer,CiteSpace V and other software,this paper analyzed and compared 10643 literatures in the Core collection of Web of Science(WoS)and 5576 literatures related to carbon emission trading in the core journals of China National Knowledge Network(CNKI)to explore the research status and development trend in this field.The results show that China's research ability in this field is improving continuously.The strength of cooperative research between countries is unbalanced,and the research institutions in China are closely cooperating with those in the United States and Britain.Compared with international literatures,domestic literatures mainly focus on policy,market mechanism,market system and other aspects,while there are few researches on energy consumption and carbon footprint tracking.Finally,the shortcomings and problems of carbon emission trading research in China are summarized in order to provide guidance and help for future scholars in this field.

关 键 词：碳排放权交易 研究热点 文献计量 碳交易市场 

分 类 号：X196[环境科学与工程—环境科学] F062.2[经济管理—政治经济学]