检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李秦 Li Qin
出 处:《医学与法学》2022年第4期80-84,共5页Medicine and Jurisprudence
摘 要:从医疗损害责任纠纷案件分析,得见专家辅助人制度在司法实践中的运用存在专家辅助人的参与率低和意见被法庭采纳率低的问题;其原因在于专家辅助人的来源有限、当事人对专家辅助人制度认识不足、法院对专家辅助人意见审查不充分和专家辅助人意见证明力较低;故完善专家辅助人制度的相应建议是畅通当事人聘请专家辅助人的渠道、建立专家辅助人资格审查制度、明确法院对专家辅助人意见的审查要求和进一步明确专家辅助人意见的证据性质。From the analysis of medical damage liability dispute cases, it is found that the application of expert assistant system in judicial practice has the problems of low participation rate of expert assistant and low acceptance rate of opinions by the court. And the reasons are that the sources of expert assistants are limited, the parties have insufficient knowledge of expert assistant system, the court does not review the opinions of expert assistants sufficiently and the expert assistants’ opinions have low proof power. Therefore, the corresponding suggestions to improve expert assistant system are to smooth the channels for the parties to hire expert assistants, establish the qualification examination system of expert assistants, clarify the review requirements of the court on the opinions of expert assistants,and further clarify the nature of expert assistants’ evidence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30