幼儿学期评语撰写行动研究  

The Action Research of Writing Semester Comments for Children

作　　者：宋梅 Song Mei

机构地区：[1]无锡城市职业技术学院师范学院,无锡214153

出　　处：《教育测量与评价》2022年第4期55-65,共11页Educational Measurement and Evaluation

基　　金：江苏省教育科学“十三五”规划课题“基于证据的幼儿园课程评价研究”(2016-GH03011-00127)的阶段性研究成果;江苏省“青蓝工程”项目;江苏省高职院校青年教师企业实践培训项目资助。

摘　　要：采用行动研究范式,对某幼儿教师学期评语内容进行分析,发现其学期评语过多迎合家长“需求”、缺少儿童立场、存在“伪评语”现象、创造性不强、发展性功能不足,等等。为此,第一轮行动研究主要带领教师了解家长眼中的“好评语”标准,并学习有关教师评价的相关理论,旨在转变教师写作意图,采用合适的评语形式从儿童立场撰写评语。第二轮行动研究采用“综合报告”式学期评语撰写方式,旨在提高学期评语的真实性,避免‘伪评语’现象。结果表明,构建以《3—6岁儿童学习与发展指南》为基础,以教师观察记录和成长档案册为证据,幼儿、家长及其他教师多主体参评的系统化评语写作程序,有利于提高幼儿学期评语的有效性、真实性和针对性。Using the normal form of action research,we analyze the content of children’s semester comments and find that there’re some problems in semester comments,such as its semester comments cater too much to the “needs” of parents,lack of children’s positions,the existence of“ pseudo-comments”,lack of creativity, and insufficient developmental functions. Therefore,the first round of action research mainly led teachers to understand the standards of“good comments”in the eyes of parents and learn relevant theories of teacher assessment,aimed at changing the intention of teachers’ writing and adopting appropriate forms of comments to write from the children’s point of view. The second round of action research adopts the writing method of “comprehensive report” in order to improve the authenticity of semester comments and avoid the phenomenon of fake “comments”. The results show that the construction of a systematic review writing program based on the Guide to the Learning and Development of Children Aged 3-6,with teacher observation records and growth archives as evidence,and multi-subject participation of young children,parents and other teachers is conducive to improving the effectiveness,authenticity and pertinence of children’s semester reviews.

关 键 词：学期评语 真实性评价 发展性评价 行动研究 

分 类 号：G61[文化科学—学前教育学]