坚持改革开放主旋律:近年来中国经济史研究的成就与展望  

Persisting in Reform and Opening-up: Achievements and Prospects of Chinese Economic History Research in Recent Years

作　　者：魏明孔 Wei Mingkong

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院大学经济学院,北京100836 [2]中国社会科学院经济研究所,北京100836

出　　处：《中国经济史研究》2022年第4期5-13,共9页Researches in Chinese Economic History

基　　金：中国社会科学院“登峰战略”资深学科带头人资助项目之阶段性成果。

摘　　要：本文对近年来尤其“十三五”期间中国经济史研究的现状进行了比较系统的梳理,强调所取得的成绩主要表现为:经济史资料的整理、甄别与利用成绩斐然,经济史研究认真总结历史上的经验教训,专题性研究有所突破,经济史研究成果得到社会普遍认可,中青年学者成为经济史研究的主力军,国际交流与合作日益加强,构建中国经济史话语体系取得了一定进展,经济史研究领域不断得到拓展,经济史研究平台进一步扩大,经济史教学与研究相得益彰,等等。文章指出经济史研究存在的问题或不足主要为:学术评论尤其学术批评是经济史研究的一个瓶颈;对部分新公布的经济史资料的甄别、深入解读和研究显得严重滞后,一些成果只是对关键词的简单量化统计,没有对资料、数据背后深层次原因的挖掘与研究;重复研究乃至学术不端现象时有发生;贯通宏大且具有理论突破的研究成果比较少见;历史学的经济史与经济学的经济史在研究方法上各自为政,融合或相互借鉴有待加强;经济史教材显得比较单薄,难能满足学科建设与人才培养的需要;对我国前辈经济史学家论著的整理与研究重视不够;部分研究成果存在为数据而数据、为模型而模型的倾向;近现代档案资料公布严重滞后,在一定程度上制约了经济史研究的深入。文章还对中国经济史研究作了展望。The author systematically sorts out the research status of Chinese economic history in recent years, especially during the “13 th Five-Year Plan” period. The paper emphasizes that the achievements are mainly reflected in the following aspects: remarkable achievements have been made in the sorting, screening and utilization of a large number of economic history materials;the research of economic history has carefully summarized the lessons of history;thematic research has made breakthroughs;the research results have been generally recognized by the society;young and middle-aged scholars become the main force of the research;international exchanges and cooperation are increasingly strengthened;some progress has been made in constructing the discourse system of Chinese economic history;the research field has been continuously expanded, the research platform has been further expanded;teaching and research of economic history complement each other, and so on. The paper points out that the problems or deficiencies in economic history research are mainly manifested in the following aspects: academic criticism is a bottleneck in the study of economic history;the screening and in-depth interpretation of some newly released economic history materials are seriously lagging behind, some research results are only simple quantitative statistics of keywords, lacking in-depth analysis of data;repeated research and even academic misconduct often occur;the researches that are comprehensive and have theoretical breakthroughs are relatively rare;the economic history of history and the economic history of economics have their own research methods, and the integration and mutual reference need to be strengthened;economic history textbooks are relatively monotonous, and it is difficult to meet the needs of discipline construction and personnel training;insufficient attention has been paid to the collation and research of the works of economic historians;some research results tend to overemphasize data and models, and exaggerate the

关 键 词：中国经济史 “十三五” 学科交融 经验教训 

分 类 号：F129[经济管理—世界经济] K207[历史地理—历史学] K092[历史地理—中国史]