孔子弟子研究辩误四题  

Four Errors of Defense in Confucius Disciples Study

作　　者：王峥 Wang Zheng(School of Literature and History,Shijiazhuang University,Shijiazhuang 050035,China)

机构地区：[1]石家庄学院文学与历史学院,河北石家庄050035

出　　处：《洛阳师范学院学报》2022年第7期39-43,共5页Journal of Luoyang Normal University

基　　金：石家庄学院博士科研启动基金项目(21BS021)。

摘　　要：孔子弟子子羔躲避卫国内乱的行为没有背离儒家思想,谨守孔子教诲而全身免祸,同时也愿意为拯救乱世贡献自己的力量。樊迟初入孔门时出于兴趣曾向孔子请教学农,后积极学习儒家礼义,未与孔子思想产生分歧。公伯寮背离了孔子思想,但至今没有直接证据否认他的孔门弟子身份。《左传》与《论语》所载司马牛的思想言行有共通性,二者应为一人,杨伯峻的质疑较难成立。以往学界对部分孔子弟子思想、身份的认知有误。Among Confucius’s disciples,Zigao’s behavior of avoiding the chaos in Wei State did not deviate from Confucianism.He adhered to the teachings of Confucius and was free from evil,but also willing to contribute his own strength to save the world.Fan Chi asked Confucius for teachings of agriculture out of interest shortly after he became a Confucian disciple,later he enthusiastically studied the Confucian etiquette and righteousness.His ideas has never been in disagreement with those of Confucius.Gongbo Liao deviated from Confucius’thought,but so far there is no direct evidence for the denial of his identity as a disciple of Confucius.Thoughts and deeds of Sima Niu described in Zuo’s Commentary on Spring and Autumn Annals and The Analects of Confucius are similar,which implies that they should be the same person,and Yang Bojun’s questioning is not tenable.These facts prove that there are errors in academic field about the thoughts and identities of Confucius’disciples.

关 键 词：子羔 樊迟 公伯寮 司马牛 辩误 

分 类 号：K225[历史地理—历史学]