论行政协议撤销案件的审理逻辑——以展鹏铸造厂诉安吉县政府搬迁案为视角  

On the Trial Logic of Administrative Agreement Revocation Cases——From the Perspective of Anji Zhanpeng Metal Precision Foundry v. Anji County People’s Government Relocation Administrative Agreement

作　　者：闫尔宝[1] Yan Er-bao(Law School of Nankai University,Tianjin 300350)

机构地区：[1]南开大学法学院,天津300350

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2022年第4期119-132,共14页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

基　　金：2018年度国家社科基金项目“《行政诉讼法》实施背景下行政诉讼结构转型研究”(项目批准号:18BFX047);2017年度司法部国家法治与法学理论研究课题“行政协议理论与审判实务问题研究”(项目批准号:17SFB2014)。

摘　　要：在缺少实体立法明确指引情况下,人民法院处理行政协议撤销案件时,无论是法律适用还是审理方式,都存在较大认识分歧,有必要通过理论检讨谋求共识。“安吉展鹏金属精密铸造厂诉安吉县人民政府搬迁行政协议案”提供了一个很好的范本。通过检讨审理该案的一、二审法院裁判意见,可以确立以下观点:行政协议撤销诉讼属于公法上当事人诉讼,不适用传统的单方行政处理撤销诉讼的受理规则;案件审理适用双向审查模式,审理焦点为行政协议应否撤销;行政机关一方的缔约行为是否合法只作为判断协议是否生效的一个要件,不应作为审理焦点,更不应单独成为司法裁判对象。Due to the absence of substantive legislation guidance, there are great differences in understanding both the application of law and the way of trial in the case of administrative agreement revocation.It is necessary to seek consensus through theoretical review.“Anji Zhanpeng Metal Precision Foundry v.Anji County People’s Government relocation administrative agreement”provides a good model.By reviewing the judgment opinions of the courts of first and second instance, we can establish the following views: the administrative agreement revocation action belongs to the party action in public law, and the traditional acceptance rules of unilateral administrative act revocation action are not applicable;The case trial applies the two-way review mode, and the trial focus is whether the administrative agreement should be revoked;The legality of the contracting act of the administrative organ is only an important element to judge whether the agreement is effective, which should not be the focus of the trial, and not be the object of judicial judgment alone.

关 键 词：行政协议撤销案件 公法当事人诉讼 双向审查模式 案件审理逻辑 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学] D920.5[政治法律—法学]