检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王琳琳 许伽彬 雷千乐 江琴[1] WANG Linlin;XU Jiabin;LEI Qianle;JIANG Qin(School of Health,Fujian Medical University,Fuzhou 350122,China)
出 处:《中国心理卫生杂志》2022年第9期793-798,共6页Chinese Mental Health Journal
基 金:福建省社会科学规划项目(FJ2019B173)。
摘 要:目的:了解青少年反刍思维与非自杀性自伤的相关性。方法:检索CNKI、WanFang Data、CBM、PubMed、Web of Science、EMbase、PsycINFO数据库,对有关非自杀性自伤与反刍思维的文献进行meta分析。结果:共纳入了15篇文献,总计17440名被试。Meta分析的结果显示,青少年反刍思维与非自杀性自伤呈正相关(r=0.22,Z=12.82,P<0.001)。亚组分析的结果显示,样本来源、文化背景及测量工具不同,并不会影响反刍思维与非自杀自伤的相关性(Q=0.03、3.45、5.39、0.56,P>0.05)。结论:青少年反刍思维与非自杀性自伤具有正向的相关。Objective:To explore the relationship between rumination and non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents.Methods:Databases such as CNKI,WanFang Data,CBM,PubMed,Web of Science,EMbase,PsycINFO were searched,and the literatures about non-suicidal self-injury and rumination were collected and analyzed by meta-analysis.Results:A total of 15 articles were included,and there were 17440 subjects.The results of meta-analysis showed that adolescent rumination was positively correlated with non-suicidal self-injury(r=0.22,Z=12.82,P<0.001).The results of the subgroup analysis showed that different sample sources,cultural backgrounds and measurement tools did not affect the correlation between rumination and non-suicidal self-injury(Q=0.03,3.45,5.39,0.56,P>0.05).Conclusion:It suggests that there is a positive correlation between rumination and non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3