考辨佛经异文应当重视佛经音义——以《六度集经》《可洪音义》异文比勘为例  

The Importance of Phonetic-Semantic Research in Ancient Buddhist Scriptures: A Version Comparison Between Liudu Jijing and Kehong Yinyi

作　　者：边田钢 Bian Tiangang(College of Language and Literature,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学文学院,浙江杭州310058

出　　处：《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2022年第5期49-55,共7页Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目之子项目(19JJD740006);国家社科基金重大项目(21&ZD295)。

摘　　要：古代佛经音义是佛经考订的先驱,不仅记录着时代更早的佛经异文,还蕴藏着精深的考订意见,对当今研究具有重要的启迪意义。参考《可洪音义》等佛经音义,可以从语言学角度辨正《六度集经》的一系列异文,如“掬寻”“褻裹”“搏矢”分别当为“探寻”“?裹”“擩矢”之形讹,“魃?”当读为“妖魑”。利用佛经音义考辨佛经异文时,需正视佛经音义本身的不足,辨析不同佛经音义之间的分歧,并从汉语史的角度解释异文的成因。Chinese Buddhist scriptures have been hand-copied and engraved for many generations,textual differences inevitably caused inconveniences to their study and dissemination leading to their collation into canonical Buddhist scriptures.The compilation and publication of Dazheng Xinxiu Dazangjing(《大正新修大藏经》)and Zhonghua Dazangjing(《中华大藏经》),completed a comparison of different texts in important editions.However,limited by various conditions at that time,further systematic discrimination between different texts was not possible,and regretted in academic circles.With further development of the study of Buddhist language,Fang Yixin and other scholars advocated the rearrangement of the Dazangjing,importantly developing systematic identification of version differences.Simultaneous research in this field won increasing attention from the academic circle and made substantial achievements.Of course,it should be noted that despite the above-mentioned scholars’appeals and practices,the guiding significance of phonetic-semantic study of ancient Buddhist scriptures has not received due attention.Due to the lack of attention to the research results of the phonetic-semantic study of ancient Buddhist scriptures,it is not uncommon in today’s academic circles to repeat the work in which the ancients have already obtained the correct answer,or ignore the correct answer and make a new interpretation that is unreasonable.In view of this,we believe that the guiding significance of the study of phonetic-semantic study is worthy of further emphasis.The phonetic-semantic study of ancient Buddhist scriptures is a pioneer in the study of ancient Buddhist scriptures.These achievements not only record the earlier Buddhist scriptures,but also contain profound research insights,providing important implications for today’s research.(1)In the passage of“手探寻之,即获虱矣”in the chapter“Shamen Bensheng”(《沙门本生》),手探corresponds to探手and掬手in other versions.掬is actually a glyph e

关 键 词：佛经 音义 异文 校勘 训诂 《六度集经》 《可洪音义》 

分 类 号：B942[哲学宗教—宗教学] H131[语言文字—汉语] G256.3[文化科学—图书馆学]