检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁勇[1,2] 王祺[1] YUAN Yong;WANG Qi(Department of Geotechnical Engineering,Tongji University,200092,Shanghai,China;不详)
机构地区:[1]同济大学地下建筑与工程系,上海200092 [2]同济大学土木工程防灾国家重点实验室,上海200092
出 处:《城市轨道交通研究》2022年第8期191-197,共7页Urban Mass Transit
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51478343,51778487)。
摘 要:以上海软土场地地铁车站结构为分析对象,通过二层三跨和三层三跨两种典型车站,与场地深度和底部边界类型组合成8组场地-车站结构分析模型,研究车站结构地震响应分析的差异,探讨地铁车站结构横向地震响应分析模型选择边界范围和类型的合理方式。结果表明:当采用底部边界黏弹性透射边界时,不同深度模型响应基本一致;采用底部固定边界模拟刚性基岩时,基岩深度70 m的规范推荐模型计算结果较为保守,结构的地震响应会放大约55%。Taking Shanghai soft soil site metro station structure as analysis object,through two typical stations of two-storey-three-span and three-storey-three-span,with site depth and bottom boundary type,8 groups of site-station structure analysis model are composed.The station structure seismic response analysis difference is investigated.Reasonable method of choosing boundary range and type for metro station structure transverse seismic response analysis model is discussed.Results show that when viscoelastic bottom boundary is adopted,the responses of different depth models are basically the same.When fixed bottom boundary is used to simulate the rigid bedrock,the calculation results of the 70 m depth model are conservative,and the seismic response of the structure will be amplified by about 55%.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.148