检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张俊俊 ZHANG Junjun(Xinjiang Air Traffic Management Bureau of CAAC,Urumqi 830016,Xinjiang,China)
机构地区:[1]中国民用航空新疆空中交通管理局,新疆乌鲁木齐830016
出 处:《民航学报》2022年第4期42-46,共5页Journal of Civil Aviation
摘 要:为提高飞行程序验证的可靠性、客观性与经济性,本文梳理出利用仿真建模的方法针对飞行程序方案进行验证和比选的一般流程,以某机场PBN离场飞行程序优化方案为例,利用AirTOp平台对其进行建模仿真,用原程序方案作为参照,选取相关指标,进行提取与比对分析。通过指标比对结果,得出相对较优的飞行程序方案,可见利用AirTOp平台对飞行程序方案进行验证比选具备可行性。In order to improve the reliability,objectivity and economy of flight procedure verification,the general flow for the verification and comparison of flight procedure schemes by using the method of simulation modeling is summarized.Taking the optimization scheme of PBN departure flight procedure of an airport as an example,it is modeled and simulated on the AirTOp platform,and the original procedure scheme is used as a reference.The relevant metrics are extracted for comparison and analysis.According to the metrics comparison results,a relatively better flight procedure scheme is obtained.It demonstrates the feasibility of using AirTOp platform to verify and compare flight procedure schemes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.239