检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李彩彦 Li Caiyan(College of Preschool and Special Education,Kunming University,Kunming,Yunnan,650000,China)
机构地区:[1]昆明学院学前与特殊教育学院,云南昆明650000
出 处:《高校辅导员学刊》2022年第4期81-88,共8页Journal of College Advisor
摘 要:基于68所高校“高校思想政治工作骨干在职攻读博士学位”招生文本分析发现,申请考核制已成为主要招生方式,但存在报考条件有重科研、外语、出身倾向;选拔方式多元,未放弃笔试,面试比重大;选拔标准模糊;高校自主招生权大,信息公开程度低,缺乏有效监督机制等问题。需要完善思政专项博士培养目标等顶层设计、设置弹性报考条件、规范选拔流程与标准、加强招生权监督和思政博导遴选改革。Analysis of on-the-job doctoral programs of 68 universities designed for backbone ideological and political workers shows that the“application-assessment”system has become the mainstream recruitment policy with priority given to scientific research ability,foreign language ability and the background.Written tests are sometimes adopted but more weight is given to the interview.As universities have a big say in such autonomous enrolment,there is usually a lack of transparency and supervision.This paper points out that special doctoral programs for ideological and political workers must have better top-level design to allow flexibility for application qualifications,standardize the recruitment procedures,strengthen supervision and selection of doctoral tutors.
关 键 词:申请考核制 高校思想政治工作骨干 博士招生 文本分析
分 类 号:G641[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.141.1