面向工程教育专业认证的高校课程评价方法改革与实践  

Reform and Practice of College Curriculum Evaluation Method for Engineering Education Accreditation

作　　者：郭锦鹏 余立 GUO Jin-peng;YU Li(School of Culture and Communication,Capital University of Economics and Business,Beijing 100070,China;Press of Beijing University of Technology,Beijing University of Technology,Beijing 100124,China)

机构地区：[1]首都经济贸易大学文化与传播学院,北京100070 [2]北京工业大学北京工业大学出版社,北京100124

出　　处：《数字印刷》2022年第4期117-123,共7页Digital Printing

摘　　要：工程教育专业认证视域下,为满足强调成果、重视实践及关注学生的理念要求,高校需要有效改革现有课程评价方法。但在当前阶段,课程评价方法与课程整体改革的脱节、课程评价对考试成绩的依赖、评价过程的落后及综合性评价理念的缺失等,严重影响评价方法改革的顺利落实。在调查研究及对比分析的基础上,高校应将课程评价方法改革置于课程教学改革整体之中,以课程目标的达成值取代考试成绩,在深度融合《工程教育认证标准》要求的基础上推进改革,构建切实有效的评价管理系统,并深化综合判断评价理念,以支撑改革的有效实践,高质量实现改革目标。From the perspective of engineering education accreditation,in order to meet the requirements of emphasizing outcome,paying attention to practice and paying attention to students,colleges and universities need to effectively reform the existing curriculum evaluation methods.However,there are many factors that seriously affect the smooth implementation of the curriculum evaluation method reform at the current stage,such as the disconnection between the curriculum evaluation method and the overall curriculum reform,the dependence of curriculum evaluation on examination results,the backwardness of the evaluation process and the lack of comprehensive evaluation concept.On the basis of investigation,research and comparative analysis,colleges should place the reform of evaluation methods on the whole of curriculum teaching reform,replace examination results with the achievement value of curriculum objectives,promote the reform on the basis of deep integration of certification requirements,build a practical and effective evaluation management system,and deepen the concept of comprehensive judgment and evaluation to support the effective practice of reform,to achieve reform goals with high quality.

关 键 词：工程教育专业认证 课程 评价方法 

分 类 号：G642.3[文化科学—高等教育学]