检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:柳超健 卓佳妮 LIU Chaojian;ZHUO Jiani
机构地区:[1]浙江传媒学院国际文化传播学院,浙江省杭州市310018 [2]浙江金融职业学院
出 处:《外语教学理论与实践》2022年第2期6-18,共13页Foreign Language Learning Theory And Practice
基 金:浙江省社科规划青年项目“认知语义学理论视域下的混合隐喻研究”(19NDQN342YB);浙江省高校领军人才培养计划项目;浙江传媒学院“三鹰工程”人才项目;江苏省社科基金项目“基于语料库的汉英动词隐喻的认知机制研究”(19YYB007)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:本研究基于眼动追踪技术,从行为表征维度对大众类(PPC)和专业类(RAC)经济语篇中隐喻阅读加工的行为真实性进行组内与组间比较。组内考察早期和晚期阶段隐喻性和直陈性词汇加工时的语义通达情况,组间探究两类词汇加工时的认知负荷程度。研究发现,词汇加工的早期阶段可激活不同语义类型,晚期阶段唯有直陈义可优先通达。隐喻义的激活过程在晚期阶段占主导地位,且这种效应只出现在晚期阶段。与PPC相比,被试加工RAC隐喻性词汇需要投入更大的认知负荷。PPC和RAC的语篇类型具有家族相似性,但其隐喻加工的行为表征依然可呈现显著差异。In this study, we compare the behavioral reality of metaphorical processing during reading in PPC and RAC economic discourse within and between groups based on eye-tracking. The intra-group study focuses on investigating the semantic access of metaphorical and literal word processing in the early and late stage, while the inter-group study mainly explores the cognitive load of metaphorical and literal word processing. It can be found that different semantic types are activated in the early stage of lexical processing, whereas only the literal meaning can be preferentially accessed in the late stage. The activation process of metaphorical meaning is dominant in the late stage and the effect is restricted to the late stage. Participants are required to put more cognitive load on the processing of RAC metaphorical words in comparison with that of PPC. Although PPC and RAC share family resemblance in terms of discourse type, their respective behavioral representations of metaphorical processing still show significant differences.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7