检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔡妍[1] 林静[2] CAI Yan;LIN Jing(College of Foreign Language,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou 350007,P.R.China)
机构地区:[1]福建师范大学 [2]福建师范大学外国语学院,350007
出 处:《外国语言文学》2022年第3期57-68,134,135,共14页Foreign Language and Literature Studies
基 金:福建省以马克思主义为指导的哲学社会科学学科基础理论研究基地重大项目“数字媒介时代公共言论的共识构建研究”(FJ2020MJDZ023)。
摘 要:《人民日报》新闻话语图式以“防控措施”为核心,历经抽象—具象—意象、安内—援外—共建的发展历程,既传达了政府层面的抗疫政策与导向,又刻画了个人层面的抗疫英雄与事迹。《朝日新闻》则以“日本疫情现状”为核心,抗疫主旨和话语对策未见明显变化。一方面聚焦疫情之下的日本国内社会细节,依赖国民自觉性防控疫情;另一方面对中国构建人类命运共同体的努力持消极态度。差异的根源在于:1)中日两国民众对突发性疫情灾难的认知结构;2)中日两国政府对突发疫情的治理和调控能力;3)中日两国的国际地位和话语权。Centering on“prevention and control measures”,news discourse schema of The People’s Daily experienced the process from abstraction to visualization to symbolization,from the maintenance of internal stability to foreign aid to globally joint efforts,not only conveying anti-epidemic instruction and spirit on the governmental level,but also depicting anti-epidemic heroes and feats on the individual level.Additionally,The People’s Daily based on domestic epidemic prevention and control as well as economic recovery,and looked out into the world by paying attention to international assistance as well as the construction of community with a shared future for mankind.The Asahi Shimbun,on the other hand,centering on“the status quo of domestic pandemic”,showed no obvious changes in the anti-epidemic themes and discourse strategies.In terms of domestic pandemic,The Asahi Shimbun focused on the concrete details and mainly depended on citizens’self-discipline to prevent and control coronavirus;in terms of global pandemic,it held a negative attitude towards China’s endeavor of constructing community with a shared future for mankind.The root causes lie in the differences in the knowledge on the emergent epidemic disaster between Chinese and Japanese people,the differences in the governance ability and macro-control ability between Chinese and Japanese governments,as well as the differences in the international status and discourse power between the two countries.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.118