检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:江旭[1,2] 靳瑞杰 沈明眉 Jiang Xu;Jin Ruijie;Shen Mingmei(School of Management,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an 710049,Shaanxi,China;Key Laboratory of Process Control&Efficiency Engineering,Ministry of Education,Xi'an Jjaotong University,Xi'an 710049,Shanxi,China)
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学管理学院,陕西西安710049 [2]西安交通大学过程控制与效率工程教育部重点实验室,陕西西安710049
出 处:《科研管理》2022年第8期63-72,共10页Science Research Management
基 金:中宣部文化名家暨“四个一批”人才自主选题资助项目:“联盟网络中企业创新模式研究”(2020—2024);国家自然科学基金项目:“联盟治理转变的过程机理及其影响效应研究”(71772148,2018—2021)。
摘 要:为什么我国多数企业醉心于创新数量的累积而普遍缺乏高质量的创新产出?本文基于政治嵌入视角,考察民营企业如何在创新数量与创新质量间进行选择决策。采用2008—2017年中国上市民营企业数据,研究发现:拥有直接政治关联的民营企业更倾向于选择低质量的策略性创新而排斥高质量的实质性创新,表明与政府“过度亲密”(亲而不清)的政企关系是企业创新的“诅咒”;拥有间接政治关联的民营企业对两类创新都有偏好,但更倾向于选择实质性创新,表明与政府“适度亲密”(即亲又清)的政企关系是企业创新的“福音”。民营企业的上述选择决策会受到企业所在地区的制度发展水平、企业与中央的行政层级距离的影响。本文从政企关系视角阐释了我国创新数量和创新质量的不匹配问题,揭示了构建“亲”“清”新型政企关系对激发高质量创新成果的重要作用,有助于指导民营企业进行正确的创新战略选择决策。In 2006, the Chinese government launched a policy reform to encourage indigenous innovation, which was applicable to all Chinese enterprises. The policy change has produced an increasing number of domestic patent applications. However, most of those patents are low-quality utility patents, with a small proportion of high-quality invention patents. Considering the critical role of the state in economic development, government-business relations are prominent for Chinese enterprises. However, prior research on the impact of political connections on firms′ innovation decisions remains inconsistent. Some studies show a beneficial impact of political connections on corporate innovation while others suggest a detriment effect. These contradictory perspectives and empirical findings present an unresolved theoretical puzzle: Do political connections promote or dampen firm innovation?Drawing on the political embeddedness perspective, this study examines how direct and indirect political connections affect private enterprises′ innovation strategies. Using a sample of Chinese private enterprises from 2008 to 2017, the empirical results show that Chinese private enterprises with direct political connections are more inclined to promote low-quality strategic innovation rather than high-quality substantive innovation, indicating that excessively intimate relationships with the government becomes the "curse" of innovation. Though such intimate relationships can generate a larger amount of low-quality strategic innovations, it will actually inhibit the development of substantive innovation. Private enterprises with indirect political connections engage in both types of innovation, but they are more inclined to employ substantive innovation rather than strategic innovation. This indicates that moderately intimate relationships with the government is the "blessing" of innovation, which is conducive to generating more innovation output, especially a larger number of high-quality substantive innovations. When private enterprises
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.26.35