检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周义锋 刘燕[1] 罗庆明 李晶[2] ZHOU Yifeng;LIU Yan;LUO Qingming;LI Jing(Chuzhou Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University/Chuzhou First People’s Hospital,Chuzhou 239000,China;Taizhou Fourth People’s Hospital,Taizhou 225300 China)
机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学附属滁州医院(滁州市第一人民医院),安徽滁州239000 [2]泰州市第四人民医院,江苏泰州225300
出 处:《中国实用神经疾病杂志》2022年第7期819-824,共6页Chinese Journal of Practical Nervous Diseases
基 金:2020年安徽理工大学校级资助项目(编号:fsyyyb2020-05)。
摘 要:目的探讨改良脑梗死溶栓(mTICI)评分2b级与mTICI 3级再灌注对急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者远期预后的影响。方法纳入2019-06—2021-06安徽医科大学附属滁州医院收治的AIS患者80例,根据血管内治疗(EVT)后mTICI再灌注程度分为A组和B组,A组为30例mTICI 2b级再灌注AIS患者,B组为50例mTICI 3级再灌注AIS患者。比较2组患者治疗后1 d梗死灶体积变化、责任血管再闭塞率、出血转化率、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分、病死率及症状性颅内出血(sICH)发生率,采用改良Rankin量表(mRS)评估2组患者预后情况。结果治疗后6个月,2组患者术后梗死灶体积、责任血管再闭塞率、出血转化率、sICH、病死率及预后良好率比较,均无统计学差异(P>0.05);治疗后1周、3个月及6个月,2组患者NIHSS评分较之前均降低,且同时间段B组NIHSS评分均低于A组(P<0.05)。结论mTICI 2b级与mTICI 3级再灌注AIS患者均能取得较好疗效及预后,但mTICI 3级再灌注AIS患者的神经功能恢复更好,预后结局更佳。Objective To investigate the effect of modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction(mTICI)grade 2b and mTICI grade 3 reperfusion on the efficacy and long-term prognosis of patients with acute ischemic stroke(AIS).Methods A total of 80 AIS patients admitted to Chuzhou Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University from June 2019 to June 2021 were selected and divided into group A and group B according to the degree of mTICI reperfusion after endovascular therapy(EVT).Group A consisted of 30 patients with mTICI grade 2b reperfusion AIS,and group B consisted of 50 patients with mTICI grade 3 reperfusion AIS.The changes in infarct volume,responsible vessel reocclusion rate,hemorrhagic transformation rate,National Institutes of Health stroke scale(NIHSS)score,fatality rate and incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage(sICH)were compared between the two groups at 1 day after treatment.The Rankin scale(mRS)was used to evaluate the prognosis of the two groups of patients.Results Six months after treatment,there were no significant differences in postoperative infarct volume,responsible vessel reocclusion rate,hemorrhagic transformation rate,sICH,fatality rate and good prognosis rate between the two groups(P>0.05).At 1 week,3 months and 6 months after treatment,the NIHSS scores of both groups were lower than before,and the NIHSS scores of group B were lower than those of group A at the same time period(P<0.05).Conclusion AIS patients with TICI grade 2b and TICI grade 3 reperfusion can achieve better curative effect and prognosis,but mTICI grade 3 reperfusion AIS patients have better neurological function recovery,which is more conducive to the prognosis of patients.
关 键 词:血管内治疗 急性缺血性脑卒中 再灌注 预后 改良脑梗死溶栓评分
分 类 号:R743.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.123