检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:佘雪琼 龙登高 SHE Xueqiong;LONG Denggao
机构地区:[1]清华大学社会科学学院博士后流动站 [2]清华大学社会科学学院
出 处:《东南学术》2022年第5期166-178,248,共14页Southeast Academic Research
摘 要:位于珠江三角洲的桑园围的管理制度在明清时期几经变迁,逐渐完善。遵循组织史研究路径,从制度与集体身份交互的理论视角,可重构明清桑园围管理制度的演变过程。这一演变是与围内十四堡集体身份的形成交互推进的过程,桑园围管理制度最终演变成为融合官方规章、民间规范、文化传统的稳定制度系统,而分属南海、顺德两县的十四堡也形成以“桑园围”为标签的集体身份,围内士绅作为制度创业者推动了这个过程的实现。关于明清桑园围管理制度演变的一种新的理论阐释,揭示了制度与集体身份交互的一种模式,并为现代基层社会的公共管理提供借鉴。In the Ming and Qing Dynasties,the management system for Mulberry Garden Dikes( Sanyuanwei)project had gradually been improved after several changes taking place. By following the research path of organizational history and applying the theoretical perspective of the interaction between institution and collective identity,we can reconstruct the evolution process of management system for Mulberry Garden Dikes project in the Ming and Qing Dynasties. The evolution of management system for Mulberry Garden Dikes project is a process of interactive advancement with the formation of collective identity of 14 pu( villages) within this enclosed area. It eventually evolved into a stable institutional system integrating official regulations,folk norms and cultural traditions. The 14 villages,which are now administered by counties of Nanhai and Shunde,also formed a collective identity labeled as“Sangyuanwei”. As institutional entrepreneurs,the gentry within the project area were promoters for the realization of this process. Thus,we canhave a new theoretical explanation of the evolution of the management system for Mulberry Garden Dikesproject in Ming and Qing Dynasties and reveal a mode of interaction between institution and collective identity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.129.58.166