“现代”是内生的还是外来的?——重返普实克与夏志清、王德威的对话  

Is Modernity Indigenous or Foreign:Rethinking Pruek’s Conversation with C.T. Hsia and David Der-wei Wang

作　　者：罗雅琳 LUO Yalin(Institute of Literature,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院文学研究所

出　　处：《中国人民大学学报》2022年第4期159-169,共11页Journal of Renmin University of China

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“20世纪中国文学学术话语体系的形成、建构与反思研究”(20&ZD280)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：捷克斯洛伐克汉学家普实克曾三次到访中国。他在20世纪30年代与鲁迅等人的交往十分著名,但他在50年代两次以官方身份访问中国并深度参与社会主义国家文化交流的经历却被人遗忘。新一代研究者对于普实克的理解通常来自两组对照关系:一是普实克与夏志清的论争,二是王德威将普实克与陈世骧、高友工等人一同划入所谓的“抒情传统”谱系。普实克在这两组对照关系中都被塑造为僵化且过时的人物。回到相关著述会发现,普实克与夏志清、王德威之间真正的分歧,在于对中国现代转型的动力来源和革命的内涵有着不同的认识,普实克在中国现代文学中所找到的现代性,不是在西方的“冲击”之下作为“回应”的现代,而是一种根植于中国自身土壤的独立的现代。The Czechoslovakian Sinologist Jaroslav Pruek is well known for his personal contacts with Lu Xun in the 1930s,but his two official visits to China in the 1950s and his deep involvement in cultural exchanges with Chinese scholars then have been forgotten.Younger scholars tend to understand Pruek on the basis of his debate with C.T. Hsia and David Der-wei Wang’s including him in the so-called “lyrical tradition” along with Chen Shixiang and Gao Yougong.In these two occasions,Pruek is portrayed as a rigid and outdated scholar.Putting these two occasions into context,we find that the real difference between Pruek and C.T. Hsia et al lies in their different understanding on the dynamic source of China’s modern transformation and the connotation of revolution.The modernity that Pruek emphasizes in modern Chinese literature is not that which “responds” to the “impact” of the West,but an independent development rooted in Chinese soil.

关 键 词：普实克 夏志清 王德威 现代性 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]