检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏雨 唐绍均[1] WEI Yu;TANG Shaojun(Schol of Law,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400044)
机构地区:[1]重庆大学法学院,重庆400044
出 处:《档案学研究》2022年第4期74-82,共9页Archives Science Study
摘 要:检察公益诉讼在档案行政管理领域的拓展,有助于满足档案公共利益充分保护与档案行政管理权力全面监督的二元现实需求。诉的利益理论、客观诉讼理论以及风险预防理论为检察公益诉讼在档案行政管理领域的拓展提供了多维证成进路。尽管“诉讼法”模式、“档案法”模式以及“专门法”模式均可作为检察公益诉讼在档案行政管理领域立法建构的可选模式,但从经济性与协调性角度看“诉讼法”模式更为适宜。立足于检察行政公益诉讼的现行规定,检察公益诉讼在档案行政管理领域的立法建构可从受案范围的扩展与诉前程序的优化两方面进行规范回应,期冀实现档案检察行政公益诉讼制度在我国的健全与善用。The expansion of procuratorial public interest litigation in the field of archives administration is helpful to meet the dual realistic needs of full protection of archives public interest and full supervision of archives administration power.The interest theory,objective litigation theory,and risk prevention theory of litigation provide a multidimensional justified approach for the expansion of procuratorial public interest litigation in the field of archives administration.Although the"procedure law"model,the"archives law"model and the"special law"model can be used as optional models for the legislative construction of procuratorial public interest litigation in the field of archives administrative management,the"procedural law"model is more appropriate from the perspective of economy and coordination.Based on the current provisions of procuratorial administrative public interest litigation,the legislative construction of procuratorial public interest litigation in the field of archives administration can be standardized from two aspects:the expansion of the scope of accepting cases and the optimization of pre litigation procedures,hoping to realize the sound and good use of archives procuratorial administrative public interest litigation system in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38