检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:翟翌[1] 范奇 ZHAI Yi;FAN Qi(School of Law,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400045,China;School of Teacher Education,Construction Base of Teachers Ethics and Style,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China)
机构地区:[1]重庆大学法学院,重庆400045 [2]西南大学教师教育学院、师德师风建设基地,重庆400715
出 处:《西南大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第5期33-44,共12页Journal of Southwest University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目“行政特许基础理论研究”(18CFX023),项目负责人:翟翌;重庆市社会科学规划项目“‘人类命运共同体’视域下的‘国际行政法’研究”(2021YBCS40),项目负责人:翟翌;重庆市社会科学规划英才项目“行政法视野下中国高校教师聘任改革的理论与制度研究”(2022YC073),项目负责人:翟翌。
摘 要:“田永案”基于法律授权条款确立了我国高校“授权组织”地位,但从判例发展来看这种“授权”理论会引发行政权扩张的风险,并延伸至实践,引发高校行为定性争议。2018年《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国行政诉讼法〉的解释》第24条第1款、第3款的分类规定及被授权组织主体要素之差异性表明,高校所授之“权”是与传统“高权”相对的“特殊权利”,这是授权的“权利要素”;高校行政诉讼被告规则同时具有“程序要素”层面意涵。授权在“权利要素”和“程序要素”方面的双层法治结构,为高校授权理论提供了一种符合大学自主性发展规律的法释义框架。该解释方案可通过指导案例发挥其应用价值,并作为推进事业单位和行业协会分类改革的支撑学说,助力整个公共行政管理领域“放管服”改革的有序推进。The “Tian Yong Case” established the status of “authorized organization” of colleges and universities in China based on the terms of legal authorization, but from the perspective of the development of precedents, this “authorization” theory will lead to the risk of administrative power expansion, and qualitative disputes over the behavior of colleges and universities in practice. At present, the academic interpretation of the authorization theory and the theory of “public legal person” are facing the dilemma of insufficient legitimacy. The classification provisions in Paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 24 of the Interpretation of the Administrative Procedure Lawissued in 2018 and the differences in the main elements of authorized organizations show that the “power” granted by colleges and universities is a “special right” opposite to the traditional “high power”,which is a “right element” of authorization. The defendant rules of administrative litigation in colleges and universities also have the meaning of “procedural elements”. The two-tier legal structure of authorization in terms of “right elements” and “procedure elements” provides a legal interpretation framework for the university authorization theory in line with the law of the development of university autonomy. The interpretation scheme can play its application value by guiding cases and serve as a supporting theory to promote the classification reform of public institutions and industry associations, helping to orderly promote the reform of “decentralization, management and service” in the whole field of public administration.
关 键 词:高校 授权 特殊权利 行政诉讼被告 二元结构 法治
分 类 号:G643[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.197.224