检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈学权[1] CHEN Xue-quan(School of Law,University of International Business and Economics,Beijing 100029,China)
出 处:《西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2022年第5期107-119,共13页Journal of Northwest University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基 金:北京市社会科学基金重点项目“《人民陪审员法》的理论创新与实施疑难问题研究”(19FXA004);对外经济贸易大学杰出青年学者资助项目(19JQ04)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:充分运用《人民陪审员法》的规定,激活人民陪审员制度,是我国刑辩律师的使命。刑辩律师应通过监督法院落实随机抽选陪审员、从有利于被告人的角度提出应由陪审员裁判的事实问题、就事实问题清单的制定积极发表辩护意见和监督法官依法履行指引、提示义务等方式激活人民陪审员制度。人民陪审员制度被激活后,刑辩律师从有利于被告人的角度考虑是否申请陪审员参与审理,在7人合议庭审理时积极阻断被排除的非法证据对陪审员的影响,并适当加强说服技巧的运用,以实现有效辩护。It is a mission of the criminal defense lawyers in modern China to promote lay assessors’ participation in trials in a substantive way.Criminal defense lawyers should activate People’s Assessor System from supervising courts’ application of the random selection mechanism for lay assessors,proposing the “factual issues” that should be judged by lay assessors favoring defendants,actively expressing defense opinions on the formulation of the list of facts,and supervising judges’ obligations performance in guiding and prompting the lay assessors.In the background of lay assessors’ participation in trials in a substantive way,criminal defense lawyers can improve the effectiveness of defense through considering whether to apply for a trial with lay assessors favoring defendants,actively blocking the impact of illegal evidence that should be excluded on lay assessors in the trials with 7-member collegiate penal,and appropriately strengthening the use of persuasion techniques.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44