周予同今古文经学划分标准问题新探  

A New Study on the Zhou Yutong's Criteria for Division of Confucian Classical Studies

作　　者：范静静[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学儒学高等研究院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《历史教学（下半月）》2022年第8期65-72,共8页History Teaching

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“多卷本《20世纪中国史学通史》”(项目编号:17ZDA196)阶段性成果之一。

摘　　要：周予同的经学史研究在20世纪中国学术史上占有重要地位。对今古文经学划分标准的讨论是周予同经学史研究中的核心问题之一。然而反观有关今古文经学的文献记载,却发现周予同提出的今古文经学划分标准与历史实际相去甚远。作为成长于五四时期的学者,周予同既受“化经为史”思潮的影响,致力于推动经学研究转化为经学史研究,同时又对晚清廖平、康有为等今文经学家划分今古文标准有所继承。传统经说与启蒙性经学史观间的矛盾,既塑造了周予同的经学史研究框架,也是导致其划分今古文经学标准难以自洽的根本原因。The study of Zhou Yutong that on the history of classical studies,had important status in Chinese academic history during 20th century.The key question of Zhou's classical study was the standards for classification of modern and ancient classics.But Zhou's view was far from reality of the history of Chinese classical.As a scholar living in the May Fourth Period,Zhou had been influenced by the trend of thought that turning Confucian classics into history,and he also had been influenced by Liao Ping and Kang Youwei who were famous modern Confucianism scholars during late Qing Dynasty.The contradictions between the traditional classics and the modern ideas of study on history of classics shaped the classical history research framework of Zhou Yutong.Meanwhile,this contradictions was also the basic reason why the Zhou's standards for classification of modern and ancient classics were difficult to reconcile.

关 键 词：周予同 今文经学 古文经学 化经为史 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]