近十年国内外创业教育评价研究热点比较与展望  

Comparison and prospect of research hotspots in entrepreneurship education evaluation in recent ten years at home and abroad

作　　者：刘雪君 凌海蓉[1,2] LIU Xuejun;LING Hairong(School of Educational Sciences,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210024,China;School of Marxism,Communication University of China,Nanjing 210046,China)

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学教育科学学院,江苏南京210000 [2]南京传媒学院马克思主义学院,江苏南京210046

出　　处：《创新与创业教育》2022年第4期58-66,共9页Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education

基　　金：2020—2021年度江苏省教育学研究生创新与学术交流中心科研项目“可持续发展理念下江苏省高校创业教育评价研究”研究成果(2510605003)。

摘　　要：为了解我国创业教育评价研究的发展水平和现有不足,采用CiteSpace可视化软件对国内外该领域研究进行关键词和聚类分析,总结国内外创业教育评价研究热点并展开对比研究。研究发现:在研究进程上,国内外研究发展均符合Shneider的学科演化理论,我国研究发展至Shneider学科演化理论的第三阶段,国外研究发展至第四阶段。在研究导向上,国内外研究都以激励大学生创新发展或自主创业为导向,我国由政府主导,国外由企业主导。在研究内容上,国内外均呈多元发展态势,但我国创业教育评价研究多集中于教育学领域,评价内容相对单一。通过以上对比,针对我国创业教育评价研究现有不足,提出创新创业教育评价手段,注重评价工具开发;专创融合、校企合作,注重创业成果转化;丰富创业教育评价内容,注重评价效果反馈等对策建议。In order to understand the development level and existing deficiencies of entrepreneurship education evaluation research in China, CiteSpace visualization software is used to conduct keyword and cluster analysis on domestic and foreign research in this field. It summarizes the research hotspots of entrepreneurship education evaluation at home and abroad and carries out a comparative study. The research finds out: In the research process, the research development at home and abroad conforms to Shneider’s four stages of discipline evolution, however, the development of China is relatively backward and has not formed an independent research system. In terms of research orientation, the research at home and abroad is oriented to encourage college students to innovate and develop or start their own business, China is led by the government, while foreign countries are led by enterprises. In terms of research content, both at home and abroad are in a pluralistic development trend, however, the evaluation research of entrepreneurship education in China mainly focuses on the field of education, and the evaluation content is relatively single. By comparison, the research on the evaluation of entrepreneurship education in China is insufficient, make the following recommendations. Innovation and entrepreneurship education evaluation means, emphasis on the development of evaluation tools, innovation integration, school-enterprise cooperation, focus on the transformation of entrepreneurial achievements, enrich the evaluation content of entrepreneurship education and pay attention to the feedback of evaluation effect.

关 键 词：创业教育 创业教育评价 CITESPACE 知识图谱 Shneider学科演化论 

分 类 号：G647.38[文化科学—高等教育学]