检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:仝文 余雪 刘志方 朱星宇 齐琦 TONG Wen;YU Xue;LIU Zhifang;ZHU Xingyu;QI Qi(College of Educational Science,Shanxi Normal University,Taiyuan 030031;College of Education,Hangzhou Normal University,Hangzhou 311121;School of Psychology,Hainan Normal University,Haikou 571158)
机构地区:[1]山西师范大学教育科学学院,太原030031 [2]杭州师范大学教育学院,杭州311121 [3]海南师范大学心理学院,海口571158
出 处:《心理与行为研究》2022年第4期450-456,共7页Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基 金:全国教育科学规划一般课题(BBA190023)。
摘 要:通过主题扫描和阅读理解两种加工深度不同的任务,考察快慢读者预测性效应差异的来源及加工深度在其中发挥的作用。被试在两种任务情境下阅读分别包含高低预测性目标词的96个句子框架,记录其眼动轨迹。结果显示:预测性效应仅在阅读理解任务中出现,快速读者在早期眼动指标上就表现出了预测性效应,慢速读者在晚期眼动指标上才表现出预测性效应。结果表明:加工深度调节快慢读者预测性效应的大小;在自然阅读情境下快慢读者的预测性效应表现符合预测编码框架假设。This study examined the source of predictability effect differences between fast and slow readers and the role of processing depth in two tasks(i.e., topic scanning and reading comprehension) with different processing depths. Participants read 96 sentence frames embedded with high and low predictive target words in two task situations while their eye movements were recorded by an eye tracker. The results showed that the predictability effect only appeared in reading comprehension task, with fast readers showing predictive effect in the early stage while slow readers showing predictive effect in the later stage. The results suggest that processing depth moderates the predictability effect of fast and slow readers. In addition, during natural reading, the predictability effect of fast and slow readers conforms to the predictive coding framework hypothesis.
分 类 号:B842[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.134.104.224