《前线日报》与抗战时期的文艺民族形式讨论  

Frontline Daily and Discussion on the Literary and Artistic National Forms during the Anti-Japanese War

作　　者：杜吉刚[1] 郝芷晴 DU Ji-gang;HAO Zhi-qing(School of Humanities,Nanchang University,Nanchang Jiangxi 330031,China)

机构地区：[1]南昌大学人文学院,江西南昌330031

出　　处：《廊坊师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2022年第3期11-15,共5页Journal of Langfang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“抗战时期文艺民族形式讨论与中国化讨论关联研究”(16BZW006)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：江西上饶时期的《前线日报》是文艺民族形式讨论的一个重要阵地,先后刊发了16篇讨论文章。其中8篇文章是直接回应“民族形式的中心源泉”议题的,其他的文章,有的探讨大众化问题,有的探讨民族形式议题的提出问题,有的探讨民族形式的建立与民族间文化交流的关系问题。《前线日报》是抗日战争时期国民党第三战区长官司令部的机关报。它作为国民党军方主办的报刊,之所以能够刊发共产党人阵营的文章,主要是由办报者群体、文章本身和文章刊发版面等多种因素所共同促成。而以国民党背景的报刊为主要刊发阵地,这也是整个东南地区文艺民族形式讨论的一个非常突出的、共同的特点。The Frontline Daily in Shangrao, Jiangxi was an important position in the discussion of literary and artistic national forms, in which sixteen articles were published successively. Eight of the articles directly responded to the issue of "the central source of the national form", while the other articles, some discussed the issue of popularization, some discussed the question raised on the topic of the national form, and some discussed the relationship between the establishment of the national form and the interethnic cultural exchange. Frontline Daily was the official mouthpiece of the Kuomintang Third Theater Command Headquarters during the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression. The reason why the newspaper sponsored by the Kuomintang military,could publish articles from the Communist camp is mainly due to the combination of various factors such as the group of newspaper publishers, the article itself, and the layout of the article. In addition, making the newspapers and periodicals with the background of the Kuomintang the main publishing positions is a very prominent and common feature in the discussion of literary and artistic national forms in the entire southeastern region.

关 键 词：《前线日报》 抗战时期 文艺民族形式 

分 类 号：I021[文学—文学理论]