检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡海慈 张合瑜 郭建立[1] 罗国新[1] 刘浩爽 HU Haici;ZHANG Heyu;GUO Jianli;LUO Guoxin;LIU Haoshuang(Ophthalmology Department,Nanyang First People's Hospital,Nanyang 473000;Neurology Department,Nanshi Hospital of Nanyang,Nanyang 473000,China)
机构地区:[1]南阳市第一人民医院眼科,河南南阳473000 [2]南阳南石医院神经内科,河南南阳473000
出 处:《临床医学研究与实践》2022年第27期104-106,共3页Clinical Research and Practice
摘 要:目的比较阿托品压抑疗法和遮盖疗法治疗小儿弱视的效果。方法根据疗法方案差异将60例弱视患儿分为遮盖组(n=30,遮盖疗法)和压抑组(n=30,阿托品压抑疗法)。比较两组的治疗效果。结果压抑组的治疗总有效率高于遮盖组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,压抑组的弱视眼裸眼视力(UCVA)和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)显著高于遮盖组和治疗前(P<0.05)。压抑组的双眼立体视觉重建总有效率、治疗总依从率高于遮盖组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论阿托品压抑疗法治疗小儿弱视的效果优于遮盖疗法。Objective To compare the effects of atropine suppression therapy and occlusion therapy in the treatment of amblyopia in children.Methods Sixty amblyopia children were divided into covering group(n=30,occlusion therapy)and suppression group(n=30,atropine suppression therapy)according to the difference of treatment schemes.The therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared.Results The total effective rate of treatment in the depression group was higher than that in the covering group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After treatment,the uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA)and best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)of amblyopic eyes in the depression group were significantly higher than those in the covering group and before treatment(P<0.05).The total effective rate of binocular stereovision reconstruction and treatment total compliance rate in the depression group were higher than those in the covering group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The effect of atropine suppression therapy on children with amblyopia is better than that of occlusion therapy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.193.189