间性、全球化与文化研究的第三条路——评金惠敏《消费他者:全球化与资本主义的文化图景》及其他  

Interculturality, Globalization and the Third Way of Cultural Studies——Comments on Jin Huimin’s Consuming Otherness: Globalization and the Images of Capitalist Culture and Others

作　　者：李圣传[1] LI Sheng-chuan(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Capital Normal University,Beijing 100089,China)

机构地区：[1]首都师范大学文学院,北京100089

出　　处：《兰州文理学院学报（社会科学版）》2022年第5期15-19,共5页Journal of Lanzhou University of Arts and Science(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：在中西文化理论的审视、反思与创造性批判中,金惠敏提出了走向“全球对话主义”的学术命题。这一理论构想,不仅是解决全球化时代“自我”与“他者”的关系问题,还在“现代性”与“后现代性”两种模式争执的调适与超越中,找寻到一条新的通往文化研究的第三条路。“全球化”是金惠敏建构并走向“全球对话主义”文化研究新模式的理论内核,其实质在于它的“文化间性”。“间性”乃至“间在论”哲学视野的引入,不仅在国际视野与中国问题、理论探索与现实关怀之间持有一种必要的理论张力,还为文化研究在不同文化和主体之间超越“二元对立”并建立对话性和交往性关系创造了理论可能,更在批判创造性思维中为重新思考文化研究和文化理论问题打开了新的思考空间。As an important scholar in the field of Chinese and Western cultural studies,Jin Huimin put forward the proposition of“global dialogism”through the reflection of Chinese and Western cultural theories.This theoretical conception not only solves the problem of the relationship between“self”and“other”in the era of globalization,but also finds a new way to the cultural studies to solve the conflict between“modernity”and“post-modernity”.Globalization is the theoretical core of the model of“global dialogism”,the essence of which lies in its Interculturality.The perspective of“Interculturality”and even“Inter-Being”not only creates a necessary theoretical tension between the international perspective and Chinese issues,theoretical exploration and practical concern,but also creates a possibility for cultural studies to beyond the“Binary Opposition”between different cultures and subjects and establish a dialogue and communication relationship.It also provides a feasible scheme for rethinking cultural studies and cultural theory in critical creative thinking.

关 键 词：全球对话主义 全球化 文化间性 间性学 文化理论 

分 类 号：G04[文化科学]