检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖仕卫[1] Xiao Shiwei
机构地区:[1]电子科技大学法律系
出 处:《地方立法研究》2022年第5期56-72,共17页Local Legislation Journal
基 金:教育部人文社会科学基金研究项目“高校纪检体制改革研究”(19JDJYLZ03)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:刑事诉讼目的理论研究近年来没有新的进展,概与研究者未将其与中国立法现实关联起来有关。暂时悬置各种理论,立足于立法事实,通过梳理刑事诉讼条文,发现刑事诉讼规则实际由调整“国家—加害方”关系、“国家—被害方”关系和“加害方—被害方”关系的三类规则体系构成,且调整后两类关系的规则占据着不可忽视的重要地位。这一立法现实对已有诸刑事诉讼目的理论构成了重大挑战,刑事诉讼目的理论必须作出相应回应。基于唯物主义的实践/理论关系,在充分关照“国家—加害方”“国家—被害方”“加害方—被害方”三组关系的基础上,刑事诉讼目的应当明确为通过正当程序查明事实真相和通过正当程序解决冲突。In recent years,there has been no new development in the theoretical study of the purpose of criminal procedure,which is probably related to the fact that researchers have not linked it to the reality of Chinese legislation.Temporarily setting aside various theories,based on legislative facts,and by sorting out the criminal procedure provisions,it is found that the criminal procedure rules are actually adjusted by the “state-injuring party” relationship,the “state-victimized party” relationship and the “injuring party-victimized party” relationship.Of these three types of rule systems,the rules for adjusting the latter two types of relations occupy an important position that cannot be ignored.This legislative reality poses a major challenge to the existing theories of criminal procedure purpose,and the criminal procedure purpose theory must respond accordingly.Based on the practical/theoretical relationship of the materialism,and fully taking into account the three groups of relationships,the purpose of criminal proceedings should be clearly established through due process investigation for truth-clarification and conflict resolution through due process.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.157