检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卢兴[1] LU Xing(College of Philosophy,Nankai University,Tianjin,China,300350)
机构地区:[1]南开大学哲学院,天津300350
出 处:《贵州大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第5期25-31,共7页Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)
基 金:2019年国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“四七之辩与儒家情感哲学的演进”(19FZXB096)。
摘 要:中国近代以来的秩序观念经历了由“天下体系”到“世界体系”的转变,这在哲学理念上体现为由“形而上的普遍性”向“逻辑的普遍性”转变。随着近代中国民族国家的建构,中国的民族主义思潮兴起,其强调特殊性的政治取向深刻影响了现代三大文化思潮。作为中国现代文化保守主义的主要代表,现代新儒学的三代学人都更为重视从普遍性的维度确证中国文化的恒久价值,而并非仅从民族文化特殊性的维度立论,这个立场与文化民族主义思潮存在着根本差异。现代新儒家的秩序观在“世界体系”的表象之下体现出对传统“天下体系”的回归,在理念上更为认同“形而上的普遍性”。因此,以单一的“民族主义”概念框架来界定现代中国的文化保守主义,显然有失偏颇。The view of order in modern China has experienced a transformation from “Tianxia system” to “World system”,which is reflected in the philosophical idea from “metaphysical universality” to “logical universality”.With the construction of modern China’s nation-state, China’s nationalist trend of thought rise, its political orientation of emphasizing particularity has a profound impact on the three modern cultural trends.As the main representative of Chinese modern cultural conservatism, the three generations of scholars of Modern new Confucianism pay more attention to confirming the eternal value of Chinese culture from the dimension of universality, rather than just from the dimension of national cultural particularity.This position is fundamentally different from the thought trend of cultural nationalism.Under the appearance of the “World system”,the order view of Modern New Confucianism reflects the return to the traditional “Tianxia system”,and more identifies with the “metaphysical universality” in idea.Therefore, it is obviously too biased to define modern Chinese cultural conservatism with a single conceptual framework of “nationalism”.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171