检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘爱华[1] 程应 LIU Aihua;CHENG Ying(School of History,Culture and Tourism,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022,China)
机构地区:[1]江西师范大学历史文化与旅游学院,江西南昌330022
出 处:《南昌师范学院学报》2022年第4期43-49,共7页Journal of Nanchang Normal University
基 金:国家社科基金冷门绝学研究专项“古笔文献稽考及制笔技艺传承研究”(19VJX161)。
摘 要:毛笔产生于何时?各种造笔说纷纭,莫衷一是。从考古文物来看,先秦时期我国出土了一些古笔,但数量较少,均系“孤品”,共存关系链条缺失,其形制、结构发生较大演变,学术界对其“历史时期”划分模糊不清。因此,基于古笔遗存,借鉴古笔文献,对古笔形制、结构、特点进行比较分析,并选择性地采用“考古类型学”方法,有助于更好厘清先秦毛笔制作工艺演进脉络。When did the writing brush come into being?There are different opinions on its manufacturing,and there is no consensus.From the perspective of archaeological relics,some Pre-Qin brushes were unearthed in China,but the number is small,all of which are isolated items,and lack the chain of coexistence relationship.Their shape and structure have undergone great changes,and the academic circle is unclear to its historical period division.Therefore,based on the remains of ancient brushes and the literature of ancient brushes for reference,a comparative analysis of the shape,structure and characteristics of ancient brushes,and the selective use of the method of archaeological typology will help to better clarify the evolution of the Pre-Qin writing-brush manufacturing technology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46