类比比较样例对物理综合题学习迁移效果的影响  

The Effect of Analogical Comparison of Worked Examples on Learning Physical Synthesis Problems

作　　者：于雅迪 杨立娜 曲可佳 YU Yadi;YANG Lina;QU Kejia(School of Psychology,Liaoning Normal University,Dalian 116029)

机构地区：[1]辽宁师范大学心理学院,大连116029

出　　处：《心理发展与教育》2022年第5期675-682,共8页Psychological Development and Education

基　　金：辽宁省教育厅人文社会科学研究一般项目(WJ2020008)。

摘　　要：研究通过三个实验,比较了普通样例和类比比较样例在学习物理综合题中的效果,并在此基础上,进一步分析两种不同类型的类比比较样例对物理综合题学习的迁移效果以及“提示”这一样例设计方法的促进作用。结果发现:(1)通过类比比较样例学习物理综合题的效果优于普通样例;(2)相比于单综概念类比比较样例,综合概念类比比较样例能更好地提高物理综合题学习的近迁移成绩,但未提高其远迁移成绩;(3)提示能明显促进类比比较样例在物理综合题学习中的作用,但不同提示类型的影响无显著差异。该结果表明:类比比较样例是学习物理综合题的有效样例形式,而其中综合概念类比比较样例效果最佳;开放式提示和支架式提示均能较好地促进类比比较样例的学习。The current study compared the effects of analogical comparison of worked examples(ACME) and traditional worked examples on learning physical synthesis problems. Furthermore, this study examined the effects of different kinds of ACME, as well as the effects of ACWE designed with different “prompts” method on physical synthesis problems learning. The results were as follows:(1) The post-test scores of the ACWE groups were significantly higher than the scores of traditional worked examples group;(2) Students in the multiple concept ACWE group performed significantly better than students in single and multiple mixed concept ACWE group on near transfer results. However, there was no significant difference between these two groups on far transfer scores;(3) Students who have learned worked-examples designed with prompts performed better than those who haven’t. However, there was no significant difference between the students who learned worked examples with scaffolding-prompts and open-prompts. The present study implied that, ACWE, especially multiple concepts ACME, is an effective way to learn physical synthesis problems. Both design methods of scaffolding-prompts and open-prompts can facilitate the learning effect of ACME.

关 键 词：物理综合题 样例 类比比较样例 提示 

分 类 号：G442[哲学宗教—心理学]