检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄继承[1] 雍红艳 阚铄 Huang Jicheng;Yong Hongyan;Kan Shuo
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学财政金融学院中国财政金融政策研究中心 [2]首都经济贸易大学金融学院,北京100070 [3]对外经济贸易大学金融学院
出 处:《世界经济》2022年第9期106-129,共24页The Journal of World Economy
基 金:中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金,19XNA003)的资助。
摘 要:本文借助中国公司债券市场多品种共存的背景,研究企业发行融资便利性不同的债券对其贷款成本的影响及作用机制。研究发现,在企业首次发债场景下,发行融资便利性较强的短融和中票显著降低了企业贷款成本,而发行融资便利性较差的公司债则对贷款成本无显著影响;在企业多次发债场景下,短融和中票的发行频率越高、规模越大则降低贷款成本的作用越强,且首次发债后再发行其他具有融资便利性的债券品种对降低贷款成本有显著增量作用。以上结果支持了企业发债影响贷款成本的替代性融资渠道机制,为相关理论提供了经验证据。In the development context of multi-head regulation and multiple bond varieties, this paper studies the impact and mechanism of corporate bond issuance with different levels of financing convenience on the loan cost of listed companies. The results of the study reveal that in the initial scenario,the issuance of short-term commercial papers and medium-term notes with greater financing convenience significantly reduces the cost of corporate loans, while the issuance of corporate bonds with relatively more constraints and less financing convenience does not seem to have a significant impact on the cost of corporate loans. In the multi-issuance scenario, the paper finds that the higher the frequency of issuance and scale of short-term commercial papers or medium-term notes, the stronger the cost-cutting effect of loans becomes. The re-issuance of other types of bonds with financing convenience after their initial issuance also has a significant incremental effect on reducing loan costs. The above results support the alternative financing channel mechanism of corporate bond issuance that affects loan costs and provide empirical evidence for the related theory.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200