江户儒者"王霸之辨"诠释中的"位""道"之争  

Edo Confucians’Dispute over Position and Political Way on the Interpretation of the Distinction Between’Wang’and’Ba’

作　　者：侯雨萌 Hou Yumeng

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学外国语学院日语系

出　　处：《世界历史》2022年第4期75-89,I0005,I0006,共17页World History

基　　金：上海市浦江人才计划项目“《孟子》日译匡谬补缮研究”(项目编号:19PJC080);上海市“世界文学多样性与文明互鉴”创新团队的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：江户儒者在诠释“王霸之辨”时特别关注王与霸在性质上到底是指“位”而言还是指“道”而言这一问题。伊藤仁斋解读王霸时没有明确区分“位”“道”,招致了后学的批判。荻生徂徕以“道”论孟子的王霸,太宰春台以“位”论孔子的王霸。薮孤山用区分字音和字义的方式,将“‘位’层面的王霸”和“‘道’层面的王霸”分开论述。冢田大峯结合历史背景,将王霸细分为“春秋时代指‘位’而言的王霸”和“战国时代指‘道’而言的王霸”。When interpreting the distinction between’Wang’and’Ba’,Edo Confucians put their focus on the question whether’Wang’and’Ba’referred to the’position’or’political way’in nature.Ito Jinsai did not clearly distinguish’position’and’political way’in his interpretation,which incurred criticism among later scholars.Ogyu Sorai explained Mencius’’Wang’and’Ba’with’political way’,and Dazai Shundai explained Confucius’’Wang’and’Ba’with’position’.Through the way of differentiating the pronunciation and meaning of words,Yabu Kozan expounded’Wang’and’Ba’at the level of’position’and’Wang’and’Ba’at the level of’political way’respectively.Combining with the historical background,Tsukada Taiho subdivided’Wang’and’Ba’into’Wang’and’Ba’at the level of’position’during the Spring and Autum Period and’Wang’and’Ba’at the level of’political way’during the Warring States Period.

关 键 词：江户儒学 王霸之辨 位与道 伊藤仁斋 荻生徂徕 

分 类 号：K313.36[历史地理—历史学] B313.3[历史地理—世界史]