检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄保持 HUANG Baochi
机构地区:[1]桂林电子科技大学法学院 [2]桂林市全州县凤凰镇大坪村委乡村振兴驻村
出 处:《国际法学刊》2022年第3期112-135,157,共25页Journal of International Law
摘 要:当事人达成争议解决协议的性质认定,以当事人选定的争议解决方式为基准。根据我国现行法律法规及司法解释等的规定,仲裁机构既有以仲裁方式解决纠纷的权能,又有以单独调解解决纠纷的权能。“争议由××仲裁委员会调解”等约定中,当事人选定的争议解决方式为调解,且选定的调解机构为仲裁机构。是故,该类型争议解决协议的性质为仲裁机构单独调解协议。The nature of thedispute settlement agreement reached by theparties shall be determined based on the dispute settlement method selected by the parties.According to theprovisions of China's current laws and regulations and judicial interpretation,arbi-tration institution have the power not only to resolve disputes by arbitration,but also to resolve disputes byindependentmediation.In such agreements as "The dispute shall be mediated by×× arbitration commission",the dispute resolution method selected by the parties is mediation,and the mediation commission selected is arbitration commission.Therefore,the nature of this type of dispute settlement agreement is the independent mediation agreement of arbitration commission.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15